ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2016
Harnessing the power of microbial autotrophy.
Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Metagenomic Insights into the Functional Profiles of Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Cycles in Yuncheng Salt Lake Under Different Salinity Gradients.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Enrichment of Hydrogen-Oxidizing Bacteria Using a Hybrid Biological-Inorganic System Under a High COMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Unravelling the metabolism of itaconate and related branched C5-dicarboxylates for COJournal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Contribution of C1 Biotechnology to the Achievement of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Organic Semiconducting Hydrogel with Integrated Microbes and Enzymes for Selective Solar COJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Microbial Primer: Bacterial energy metabolism.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Review
- Forest Type Shapes Soil Microbial Carbon Metabolism: A Metagenomic Study of Subtropical Forests on Lushan Mountain.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Microbial carbon fixation pathways shifts during artificialFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Land use reshapes soil cercozoan functional architecture through soil chemistry and fungal networks.ISME communications · 2026Article
- A microbiologist's field guide to community ecology.ISME communications · 2026Review
- Cell-Free Systems to Mimic and Expand Metabolism.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Review
- Assessing environmental gradients in relation to dark COApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Seven critical challenges in synthetic one-carbon assimilation and their potential solutions.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- A synthetic methylotroph achieves accelerated cell growth by alleviating transcription-replication conflicts.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Autotrophic bacterial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates using carbon dioxide as a sustainable carbon source.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Concatenating Microbial, Enzymatic, and Organometallic Catalysis for Integrated Conversion of Renewable Carbon Sources.JACS Au · 2024Review
- Adaptive expression of phage auxiliary metabolic genes in paddy soils and their contribution toward global carbon sequestration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Introducing carbon assimilation in yeasts using photosynthetic directed endosymbiosis.Nature communications · 2024Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autotrophic microorganisms convert CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
27665719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.