ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2016
Influence of nanogel additive hydrophilicity on dental adhesive mechanical performance and dentin bonding.
Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Bioactive Dental Adhesives for Caries Prevention: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Evolution of Dental Resin Adhesives-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Characterization of Experimental Nanoparticulated Dental Adhesive Resins with Long-Term Antibacterial Properties.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Sorption, solubility and cytotoxicity of novel antibacterial nanofilled dental adhesive resins.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the influence of hydrophilicity of reactive nanogels on the mechanical performance of dental adhesives and microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin after 24h or 3 months of aging.
methodsA series of three nanogels were synthesized: NG1-IBMA/UDMA; NG2-HEMA/BisGMA; NG3-HEMA/TE-EGDMA. The nanogels were dispersed in solvent, HEMA or BisGMA/HEMA. The degree of conversion (DC) of the materials was measured and the flexural modulus of these polymers was evaluated in dry or wet conditions. For μTBS analysis, a model adhesive was used without nanogel (control) or with the incorporation of nanogels. μTBS was evaluated after storage in distilled water for 24h or 3 months. The analysis of the fracture was performed after μTBS testing. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05).
resultsWater significantly increased the modulus of NG1 and NG2 dispersed in solvent, while significantly decreased the stiffness of NG3. All polymers dispersed in HEMA and BisGMA/HEMA had significantly lower modulus when stored in water. NG2 showed the highest DC in solvent and BisGMA/HEMA. In HEMA, NG1 and NG3 produced the highest DC. After three months, NG2 showed the best μTBS. The μTBS of NG2-containing adhesive resin significantly increased after 3 months, while storage had no effect in the control group, NG1 and NG3. SIGNIFICANCE: The more hydrophobic IBMA/UDMA nanogel showed higher bulk material mechanical property results, but the best dentin bond strength values, and notably strength values that improved upon storage, were obtained with the amphiphilic nanogel based on BisGMA/HEMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.