Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27665113›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2016

Hypergraph Based Feature Selection Technique for Medical Diagnosis.

Nivethitha Somu, M R Gauthama Raman, Kannan Kirthivasan, V S Shankar Sriram

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nivethitha SomuCentre for Information Super Highway (CISH), School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
M R Gauthama RamanCentre for Information Super Highway (CISH), School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kannan KirthivasanDepartment of Mathematics, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
V S Shankar SriramCentre for Information Super Highway (CISH), School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. sriram@it.sastra.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of internet and information systems across various domains have resulted in substantial generation of multidimensional datasets. The use of data mining and knowledge discovery techniques to extract the original information contained in the multidimensional datasets play a significant role in the exploitation of complete benefit provided by them. The presence of large number of features in the high dimensional datasets incurs high computational cost in terms of computing power and time. Hence, feature selection technique has been commonly used to build robust machine learning models to select a subset of relevant features which projects the maximal information content of the original dataset. In this paper, a novel Rough Set based K - Helly feature selection technique (RSKHT) which hybridize Rough Set Theory (RST) and K - Helly property of hypergraph representation had been designed to identify the optimal feature subset or reduct for medical diagnostic applications. Experiments carried out using the medical datasets from the UCI repository proves the dominance of the RSKHT over other feature selection techniques with respect to the reduct size, classification accuracy and time complexity. The performance of the RSKHT had been validated using WEKA tool, which shows that RSKHT had been computationally attractive and flexible over massive datasets.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData MiningDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansMachine LearningFeature selectionHigh dimensional datasetsHypergraphK – Helly propertyMedical diagnosisRough set theory (RST)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.