Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27664958›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2016

3D deformation field in growing plant roots reveals both mechanical and biological responses to axial mechanical forces.

François Bizet, A Glyn Bengough, Irène Hummel, Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot, Lionel X Dupuy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. On the mechanical origins of waving, coiling and skewing inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Compression of a pressurized spherical shell by a spherical or flat probe.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

François BizetUMR EEF, INRA, Université de Lorraine, 54280 Champenoux, France.
A Glyn BengoughJames Hutton Institute, Ecological Sciences group, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK glyn.bengough@hutton.ac.uk triboulo@nancy.inra.fr.
Irène HummelUMR EEF, INRA, Université de Lorraine, 54280 Champenoux, France.
Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-TriboulotUMR EEF, INRA, Université de Lorraine, 54280 Champenoux, France glyn.bengough@hutton.ac.uk triboulo@nancy.inra.fr.
Lionel X DupuyJames Hutton Institute, Ecological Sciences group, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK.
Silva · FRJames Hutton Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strong regions and physical barriers in soils may slow root elongation, leading to reduced water and nutrient uptake and decreased yield. In this study, the biomechanical responses of roots to axial mechanical forces were assessed by combining 3D live imaging, kinematics and a novel mechanical sensor. This system quantified Young's elastic modulus of intact poplar roots (32MPa), a rapid <0.2 mN touch-elongation sensitivity, and the critical elongation force applied by growing roots that resulted in bending. Kinematic analysis revealed a multiphase bio-mechanical response of elongation rate and curvature in 3D. Measured critical elongation force was accurately predicted from an Euler buckling model, indicating that no biologically mediated accommodation to mechanical forces influenced bending during this short period of time. Force applied by growing roots increased more than 15-fold when buckling was prevented by lateral bracing of the root. The junction between the growing and the mature zones was identified as a zone of mechanical weakness that seemed critical to the bending process. This work identified key limiting factors for root growth and buckling under mechanical constraints. The findings are relevant to crop and soil sciences, and advance our understanding of root growth in heterogeneous structured soils.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, BiologicalPlant RootsPopulusStress, MechanicalTime-Lapse Imaging3D imagingbiomechanicsbucklingkinematicsroot growthYoung’s elastic modulus.

Identifiers

PMID27664958
PMCPMC5066484
OpenAlexW2421615700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.