Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27664189›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2016

Exercise training increases protein O-GlcNAcylation in rat skeletal muscle.

Kristin Halvorsen Hortemo, Per Kristian Lunde, Jan Haug Anonsen, Heidi Kvaløy, Morten Munkvik, Tommy Aune Rehn, Ivar Sjaastad, Ida Gjervold Lunde, Jan Magnus Aronsen, Ole M Sejersted

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. O-GlcNAcase Inhibitor Improves Denervation-Induced Muscle Atrophy in Mice.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. ProteinMetabolites · 2022
    Review
  7. Cells · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Role ofPhysiological reviews · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin Halvorsen HortemoInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway k.h.hortemo@medisin.uio.no.
Per Kristian LundeInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Haug AnonsenDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Heidi KvaløyInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Morten MunkvikInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tommy Aune RehnInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ivar SjaastadInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ida Gjervold LundeInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Magnus AronsenInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Bjørknes College, Oslo, Norway.
Ole M SejerstedInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Center for Heart Failure Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Institutt for Eksperimentell Medisinsk Forskning · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein O-GlcNAcylation has emerged as an important intracellular signaling system with both physiological and pathophysiological functions, but the role of protein O-GlcNAcylation in skeletal muscle remains elusive. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that protein O-GlcNAcylation is a dynamic signaling system in skeletal muscle in exercise and disease. Immunoblotting showed different protein O-GlcNAcylation pattern in the prototypical slow twitch soleus muscle compared to fast twitch EDL from rats, with greater O-GlcNAcylation level in soleus associated with higher expression of the modulating enzymes O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT), O-GlcNAcase (OGA), and glutamine fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase isoforms 1 and 2 (GFAT1, GFAT2). Six weeks of exercise training by treadmill running, but not an acute exercise bout, increased protein O-GlcNAcylation in rat soleus and EDL There was a striking increase in O-GlcNAcylation of cytoplasmic proteins ~50 kDa in size that judged from mass spectrometry analysis could represent O-GlcNAcylation of one or more key metabolic enzymes. This suggests that cytoplasmic O-GlcNAc signaling is part of the training response. In contrast to exercise training, postinfarction heart failure (HF) in rats and humans did not affect skeletal muscle O-GlcNAcylation level, indicating that aberrant O-GlcNAcylation cannot explain the skeletal muscle dysfunction in HF Human skeletal muscle displayed extensive protein O-GlcNAcylation that by large mirrored the fiber-type-related O-GlcNAcylation pattern in rats, suggesting O-GlcNAcylation as an important signaling system also in human skeletal muscle.

Indexed as

Exercisefatigueheart failureO‐GlcNAcylationskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID27664189
PMCPMC5037911
OpenAlexW2521360559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.