Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27663987›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Decoding information about dynamically occluded objects in visual cortex.

Gennady Erlikhman, Gideon P Caplovitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontotemporal network contribution to occluded face processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamically occluded action recognition by pigeons.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The nature of neural object representations during dynamic occlusion.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gennady ErlikhmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA. Electronic address: gennaer@gmail.com.
Gideon P CaplovitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Investigating Working Memory Encoding using Frequency-Tagging of Evoked ResponseR15EY022775 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI BERRYHILL, MARIAN E, CAPLOVITZ, GIDEON PAUL · 2012 to 2012
$407k
Neural correlates of spatiotemporal form intergationF32EY025520 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI ERLIKHMAN, GENNADY · 2015 to 2017
$164k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY025520NEI NIH HHS R15 EY022775NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During dynamic occlusion, an object passes behind an occluding surface and then later reappears. Even when completely occluded from view, such objects are experienced as continuing to exist or persist behind the occluder even though they are no longer visible. The contents and neural basis of this persistent representation remain poorly understood. Questions remain as to whether there is information maintained about the object itself (i.e. its shape or identity) or non-object-specific information such as its position or velocity as it is tracked behind an occluder, as well as which areas of visual cortex represent such information. Recent studies have found that early visual cortex is activated by "invisible" objects during visual imagery and by unstimulated regions along the path of apparent motion, suggesting that some properties of dynamically occluded objects may also be neurally represented in early visual cortex. We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging in human subjects to examine representations within visual cortex during dynamic occlusion. For gradually occluded, but not for instantly disappearing objects, there was an increase in activity in early visual cortex (V1, V2, and V3). This activity was spatially-specific, corresponding to the occluded location in the visual field. However, the activity did not encode enough information about object identity to discriminate between different kinds of occluded objects (circles vs. stars) using MVPA. In contrast, object identity could be decoded in spatially-specific subregions of higher-order, topographically organized areas such as ventral, lateral, and temporal occipital areas (VO, LO, and TO) as well as the functionally defined LOC and hMT+. These results suggest that early visual cortex may only represent the dynamically occluded object's position or motion path, while later visual areas represent object-specific information.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual CortexVisual FieldsDynamic occlusionMVPAObject representationShape perceptionV1

Identifiers

PMID27663987
PMCPMC5322156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.