Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27663857›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016

[The most important current guideline recommendations on the topic urolithiasis : A brief comparison].

E Storz, F Kurtz, M Straub

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E StorzUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
F KurtzUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
M StraubUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. michael.straub@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the development of patient-specific therapies the guidelines offer the physician a valuable catalogue of possible treatment options. They are based on the current level of knowledge and urological research, but also let some space for individual treatment at the same time. In this article, the current guidelines of several urological associations on the topic of urolithiasis regarding recommendations are described and the differences are highlighted.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHumansPatient-Centered CarePractice Guidelines as TopicRadiologyUrolithiasisUrologyMetaphylaxisRenal colic, acuteStone therapy, conservativeUreteral calculiUrinary stone therapy, interventional

Identifiers

PMID27663857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.