Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27663575›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2017

Reciprocal Relationships between Teacher Ratings of Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors in Adolescents with Different Levels of Cognitive Abilities.

Alexandre J S Morin, A Katrin Arens, Christophe Maïano, Joseph Ciarrochi, Danielle Tracey, Philip D Parker, Rhonda G Craven

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Psychosocial Difficulties Profiles Among Youth with Intellectual Disabilities.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandre J S MorinInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia. Alexandre.Morin@acu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6898-4788
A Katrin ArensGerman Institute for International Educational Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christophe MaïanoUniversité du Québec en Outaouais, Saint-Jérome, Québec, Canada.
Joseph CiarrochiInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia.
Danielle TraceyWestern Sydney University, Milperra, Australia.
Philip D ParkerInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia.
Rhonda G CravenInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Are internalizing and externalizing behavior problems interrelated via mutually reinforcing relationships (with each behavior leading to increases over time in levels of the other behavior) or mutually suppressing relationships (with each behavior leading to decreases over time in levels of the other behavior)? Past research on the directionality of these relationships has led to ambiguous results, particularly in adolescence. Furthermore, the extent to which prior results will generalize to adolescents with low levels of cognitive abilities remains unknown. This second limit is particularly important, given that these adolescents are known to present higher levels of externalizing and internalizing behaviors than their peers with average-to-high levels of cognitive abilities, and that the mechanisms involved in the reciprocal relationships between these two types of behaviors may differ across both populations. This study examines the directionality of the longitudinal relationships between externalizing and internalizing behavior problems as rated by teachers across three measurement waves (corresponding to Grades 8-10) in matched samples of 138 adolescents (34.78 % girls) with low levels of cognitive abilities and 556 adolescents (44.88 % girls) with average-to-high levels of cognitive abilities. The results showed that the measurement structure was fully equivalent across time periods and groups of adolescents, revealing high levels of developmental stability in both types of problems, and moderately high levels of cross-sectional associations. Levels of both internalizing and externalizing behaviors were higher among adolescents with low levels of cognitive abilities relative to those with average-to-high levels of cognitive abilities. Finally, the predictive analyses revealed negative reciprocal longitudinal relationships (i.e., mutually suppressing relationships) between externalizing and internalizing problems, a result that was replicated within samples of adolescents with low, and average-to-high levels of cognitive ability.

Indexed as

CognitionInternal-External ControlSchool TeachersAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildCross-Sectional StudiesDefense MechanismsFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsAdolescentsAutoregressive cross-laggedCognitive abilitiesExternalizing behaviorsInternalizing behaviorsLongitudinalTeacher ratings

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.