ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2016
Professional Use of Social Media by Pharmacists: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preserving professional identities, behaviors, and values in digital professionalism using social networking sites; a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2021Pooled it
- Use of Social Network Sites for Communication Among Health Professionals: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- Baloxavir marboxil-related information on Douyin and Xiaohongshu: a cross-sectional analysis of content, misinformation, and user engagement.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Public views, patterns, and impacts of social networking site use for medicine-related information in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Behind the counter, behind the discourse: The paradox of pharmacist influence in Arabic women's health online.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Clicks for credit: an analysis of healthcare professionals' social media use and potential for continuing professional development activities.Medical education online · 2024Article
- Effects of Health Information Dissemination on User Follows and Likes during COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Data and Content Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Positioning and Utilization of Information and Communication Technology in Community Pharmacies of Selangor, Malaysia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles.BMC medical education · 2018Article
- Public Perceptions Regarding Use of Virtual Reality in Health Care: A Social Media Content Analysis Using Facebook.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- A Health Professional-Led Synchronous Discussion on Facebook: Descriptive Analysis of Users and Activities.JMIR formative research · 2017Article
- Do pharmacists use social media for patient care?International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial media is frequently used by consumers and health care professionals; however, our knowledge about its use in a professional capacity by pharmacists is limited.
objectiveOur aim was to investigate the professional use of social media by pharmacists.
methodsIn-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with practicing pharmacists (N=31) from nine countries. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed.
resultsWikipedia, YouTube, and Facebook were the main social media platforms used. Professional use of social media included networking with peers, discussion of health and professional topics, accessing and sharing health and professional information, job searching, and professional promotion. Wikipedia was the participants' first choice when seeking information about unfamiliar topics, or topics that were difficult to search for. Very few pharmacy-related contributions to Wikipedia were reported. YouTube, a video-sharing platform, was used for self-education. University lectures, "how-to" footage, and professionally made videos were commonly watched. No professional contribution was made to YouTube. Facebook, a general social networking site, was used for professional networking, promotion of achievements, and job advertisements. It also afforded engagement in professional discussions and information sharing among peers.
conclusionsParticipants used social media in a professional capacity, specifically for accessing and sharing health and professional information among peers. Pharmacists, as medicines experts, should take a leading role in contributing to health information dissemination in these user-friendly virtual environments, to reach not only other health care professionals but also health consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.