Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27663310›Full record

ReviewHuman genomics2016

Major influence of repetitive elements on disease-associated copy number variants (CNVs).

Ana R Cardoso, Manuela Oliveira, Antonio Amorim, Luisa Azevedo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Haematologica · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Extensive genome-wide duplications in the eastern oyster (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Replication-Based Rearrangements Are a Common Mechanism for SNCA Duplication in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mapping the genomic landscape of inherited retinal disease genes prioritizes genes prone to coding and noncoding copy-number variations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana R CardosoInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Manuela OliveiraInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Antonio AmorimInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal.
Luisa AzevedoInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. lazevedo@ipatimup.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-7342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) are important contributors to the human pathogenic genetic diversity as demonstrated by a number of cases reported in the literature. The high homology between repetitive elements may guide genomic stability which will give rise to CNVs either by non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Here, we present a short guide based on previously documented cases of disease-associated CNVs in order to provide a general view on the impact of repeated elements on the stability of the genomic sequence and consequently in the origin of the human pathogenic variome.

Indexed as

Copy number variants (CNVs)Genetic diseasesGenomic structural variationLINELow copy repeatsNon-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR)RetrotransposonsSINE

Identifiers

PMID27663310
PMCPMC5035501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.