Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27663171›Full record

ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2017

Concise Review: Lessons from Naïve Human Pluripotent Cells.

Carol B Ware

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Specification of the First Mammalian Cell Lineages In Vivo and In Vitro.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  19. microRNAs Regulating Human and Mouse Naïve Pluripotency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carol B WareDepartment of Comparative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Self Renewal and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem CellsP01GM081619 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REH, THOMAS A · 2007 to 2017
$20.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM081619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The naïve state of pluripotency is actively being explored by a number of labs. There is some controversy in the field as to the true identity of naïve human pluripotent cells as they are not exact mirrors of the mouse. The various reports published, although in basic agreement, present discrepancies in the characterization of the various lines, which likely reflect the etiology of these lines. The primary lesson learned from these contributions is that a human naïve state reflecting the preimplantation human is likely to exist. The essential factors that will universally maintain the naïve state in human cells in vitro are not yet fully understood. These first need to be identified in order to describe the definitive characteristics of this state. Comparisons of naïve and primed human pluripotent cells have also highlighted consistencies between states and broadened our understanding of embryonic metabolism, epigenetic change required for development, embryonic DNA repair strategies and embryonic expression dynamics. Stem Cells 2017;35:35-41.

Indexed as

Cell LineEpigenesis, GeneticHumansPluripotent Stem CellsHuman embryonic stem cellsNaïvePluripotentPreimplantationPrimed

Identifiers

PMID27663171
PMCPMC5195867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.