Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27663120›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2016

Assessing accuracy of imputation using different SNP panel densities in a multi-breed sheep population.

Ricardo V Ventura, Stephen P Miller, Ken G Dodds, Benoit Auvray, Michael Lee, Matthew Bixley, Shannon M Clarke, John C McEwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Genomic Selection for Milk Production Traits in Xinjiang Brown Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. SNPs in Sheep: Characterization of Lithuanian Sheep Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ricardo V VenturaCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G2W1, Canada.
Stephen P MillerCentre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G2W1, Canada. miller@uoguelph.ca.
Ken G DoddsInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Limited, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Benoit AuvrayDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand.
Michael LeeDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand.
Matthew BixleyInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Limited, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
Shannon M ClarkeInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Limited, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
John C McEwanInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch Limited, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenotype imputation is a key element of the implementation of genomic selection within the New Zealand sheep industry, but many factors can influence imputation accuracy. Our objective was to provide practical directions on the implementation of imputation strategies in a multi-breed sheep population genotyped with three single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels: 5K, 50K and HD (600K SNPs).

resultsImputation from 5K to HD was slightly better (0.6 %) than imputation from 5K to 50K. Two-step imputation from 5K to 50K and then from 50K to HD outperformed direct imputation from 5K to HD. A slight loss in imputation accuracy was observed when a large fixed reference population was used compared to a smaller within-breed reference (including all 50K genotypes on animals from different breeds excluding those in the validation set i.e. to be imputed), but only for a few animals across all imputation scenarios from 5K to 50K. However, a major gain in imputation accuracy for a large proportion of animals (purebred and crossbred), justified the use of a fixed and large reference dataset for all situations. This study also investigated the loss in imputation accuracy specifically for SNPs located at the ends of each chromosome, and showed that only chromosome 26 had an overall imputation (5K to 50K) accuracy for 100 SNPs at each end higher than 60 % (r

conclusionsImputation accuracy in sheep breeds can be improved by following a set of recommendations on SNP panels, software, strategies of imputation (one- or two-step imputation), and choice of the animals to be genotyped using both high- and low-density SNP panels. We present a method that predicts imputation accuracy for individual animals at the low-density level, before running imputation, which can be used to restrict genomic prediction only to the animals that can be imputed with sufficient accuracy.

Identifiers

PMID27663120
PMCPMC5035503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.