Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27662884›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2017

Implementation of a Multicenter Biobanking Collaboration for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Biomarker Discovery Based on Fresh Frozen Pretreatment Tumor Tissue Biopsies.

Sander Bins, Geert A Cirkel, Christa G Gadellaa-Van Hooijdonk, Fleur Weeber, Isaac J Numan, Annette H Bruggink, Paul J van Diest, Stefan M Willems, Wouter B Veldhuis, Michel M van den Heuvel and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immune related biomarkers for cancer metastasis to the brain.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  6. Cell membrane-camouflaged liposomes for tumor cell-selective glycans engineering and imaging in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Drug Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Blame the Barrier or the Brain?Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Sander BinsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Geert A CirkelCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christa G Gadellaa-Van HooijdonkCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fleur WeeberCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Isaac J NumanCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annette H BrugginkCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan M WillemsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter B VeldhuisCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michel M van den HeuvelCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rob J de KnegtCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marco J KoudijsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erik van WerkhovenCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Edwin CuppenCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan SleijferCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan H M SchellensCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emile E VoestCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marlies H G LangenbergCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maja J A de JongeCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Neeltje SteeghsCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn P LolkemaCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment, Utrecht, The Netherlands m.lolkema@erasmusmc.nl.
Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment · NLRotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLCancer Genomics Centre · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLCenter for Translational Molecular Medicine · NLCentral Military Hospital · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe discovery of novel biomarkers that predict treatment response in advanced cancer patients requires acquisition of high-quality tumor samples. As cancer evolves over time, tissue is ideally obtained before the start of each treatment. Preferably, samples are freshly frozen to allow analysis by next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing (NGS) but also for making other emerging systematic techniques such as proteomics and metabolomics possible. Here, we describe the first 469 image-guided biopsies collected in a large collaboration in The Netherlands (Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment) and show the utility of these specimens for NGS analysis. PATIENTS AND

methodsImage-guided tumor biopsies were performed in advanced cancer patients. Samples were fresh frozen, vital tumor cellularity was estimated, and DNA was isolated after macrodissection of tumor-rich areas. Safety of the image-guided biopsy procedures was assessed by reporting of serious adverse events within 14 days after the biopsy procedure.

resultsBiopsy procedures were generally well tolerated. Major complications occurred in 2.1%, most frequently consisting of pain. In 7.3% of the percutaneous lung biopsies, pneumothorax requiring drainage occurred. The majority of samples (81%) contained a vital tumor percentage of at least 30%, from which at least 500 ng DNA could be isolated in 91%. Given our preset criteria, 74% of samples were of sufficient quality for biomarker discovery. The NGS results in this cohort were in line with those in other groups.

conclusionImage-guided biopsy procedures for biomarker discovery to enable personalized cancer treatment are safe and feasible and yield a highly valuable biobank. The Oncologist 2017;22:33-40Implications for Practice: This study shows that it is safe to perform image-guided biopsy procedures to obtain fresh frozen tumor samples and that it is feasible to use these biopsies for biomarker discovery purposes in a Dutch multicenter collaboration. From the majority of the samples, sufficient DNA could be yielded to perform next-generation sequencing. These results indicate that the way is paved for consortia to prospectively collect fresh frozen tumor tissue.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsBiomarkers, TumorAdvanced cancer patientsFeasibility and safetyImage‐guided biopsy proceduresNext‐generation sequencingPersonalized cancer treatmentPrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID27662884
PMCPMC5313271
OpenAlexW2521526822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.