Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27662818›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Utility of serum anti-cetuximab immunoglobulin E levels to identify patients at a high risk of severe hypersensitivity reaction to cetuximab.

Benoît Dupont, Delphine Mariotte, Audrey E Dugué, Bénédicte Clarisse, Jean-Michel Grellard, Emmanuel Babin, Bruno Chauffert, Stéphanie Dakpé, Cristian Moldovan, Karine Bouhier-Leporrier and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Benoît DupontDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Delphine MariotteLaboratory of Immunology and Immunopathology, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Audrey E DuguéClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Bénédicte ClarisseClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Jean-Michel GrellardClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Emmanuel BabinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Bruno ChauffertMedical Oncology Department, CHU d'Amiens, Amiens, France.
Stéphanie DakpéDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, CHU d'Amiens, Amiens, France.
Cristian MoldovanMedical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
Karine Bouhier-LeporrierDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Jean-Marie ReimundDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Frederic Di FioreMedical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
Sylvie ZanettaMedical Oncology Department, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Audrey MailliezHead and Neck Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Pascal DoMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Annie PeytierGastroenterology Department, Centre Hospitalier de Bayeux, Bayeux, France.
Marie-Pierre GalaisMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Carmen FlorescuMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Roland SchottMedical Oncology Department, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France.
Brigitte Le MauffLaboratory of Immunology and Immunopathology, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
Radj GervaisMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Centre François Baclesse · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRUniversité de Caen Normandie · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRCentre Henri BecquerelCentre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRLevi Strauss (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCetuximab is an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody used for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and head and neck cancer. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are associated with cetuximab use. The aim of the study was to evaluate the utility of anti-cetuximab immunoglobulin E (IgE) detection in order to identify patients at risk of HSR to cetuximab.

methodsWe included patients ready to receive a first cetuximab infusion in a prospective cohort carried out at nine French centres. Pretreatment anti-cetuximab IgE levels were measured. We compared the proportion of severe HSRs in the low anti-cetuximab IgE levels (≤29 IgE arbitrary units) subgroup with that in a historical cohort of 213 patients extracted from a previous study.

resultsOf the 301 assessable patients (mean age: 60.9 ± 9.3 years, head-and-neck cancer: 77%), 66 patients (22%) had high anti-cetuximab IgE levels, and 247 patients received cetuximab (including 38 with high anti-cetuximab levels). Severe HSRs occurred in eight patients (five grade 3 and three grade 4). The proportion of severe HSRs was lower in the low anti-cetuximab IgE levels subgroup vs. the historical cohort (3/209 [1.4%] vs. 11/213 [5.2%], odds ratio, 0.27, 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.97), and higher in high vs. low anti-cetuximab IgE levels subgroup (5/38 [13.2%] vs. 3/209 [1.4%]; odds ratio, 10.4, 95% confidence interval, 2.4-45.6). Patients with severe HSRs had higher anti-cetuximab IgE levels than patients without reaction (median, 45 vs. 2 IgE arbitrary units, P = 0.006).

conclusionsDetection of pretreatment anti-cetuximab IgE is feasible and helpful to identify patients at risk of severe cetuximab-induced HSRs.

Indexed as

CetuximabDrug HypersensitivityFemaleFranceHumansImmunoglobulin EMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsCetuximabImmunoglobulin Eanaphylaxisanti-immunoglobulin E antibodiescetuximabhypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID27662818
PMCPMC5306475
OpenAlexW2523881981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.