Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27662654›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Varenicline and Risk of Self-Harm: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Mina Tadrous, Diana Martins, Zhan Yao, Muhammad M Mamdani, David N Juurlink, Tara Gomes, Tony Antoniou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mina TadrousLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-6129
Diana MartinsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Zhan YaoInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Muhammad M MamdaniLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
David N JuurlinkInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Tara GomesLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Tony AntoniouInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking remains a serious public health concern. Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation, including bupropion and varenicline, are proven means to increase quit rates. Post-marketing reports describing suicidal behaviours have raised concerns about the safety of varenicline. However, whether varenicline imparts a higher risk of suicide relative to bupropion remains uncertain.

methodsA population-based nested case-control study in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2015 was conducted. Subjects were residents of Ontario aged 18 years and older with publicly funded drug coverage receiving either bupropion or varenicline for smoking cessation. We defined cases were those with a hospitalization or emergency department visit for suicide or non-fatal self-harm within 90 days of treatment. For each case, we identified up to fifty controls from the same cohort matched on age, sex, history of self-harm, use of selected psychotropic medications, alcohol abuse and prior admission to a mental health unit. Adjusted odds ratio were used to compare the risk of suicide/self-harm of varenicline to bupropion.

resultsWe identified 331 cases and 5,346 matched-controls. Following adjustment for potential confounders, we found that varenicline was not associated with an increased risk of suicide/self-harm relative to bupropion (adjusted odds ratio 1.15; 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.87).

interpretationTreatment with varenicline does not appear to significantly increase the risk of suicide or self-harm relative to bupropion.

Identifiers

PMID27662654
PMCPMC5035025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.