ArticleBrain and cognition2016
An individual differences analysis of the neurocognitive architecture of the semantic system at rest.
Article in Brain and cognition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Japanese LDA model for automatic clustering analysis of semantic verbal fluency tests.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Test-retest reliability of MEG functional brain connectivity related to language production: Behavioral, functional, and structural underpinnings of reliable connectivity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Divergent and convergent creativity relate to different aspects of semantic control.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Verbal semantic expertise is associated with reduced functional connectivity between left and right anterior temporal lobes.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Generalizable predictive modeling of semantic processing ability from functional brain connectivity.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Intrinsic connectivity of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex predicts individual differences in controlled semantic retrieval.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Neural classification maps for distinct word combinations in Broca's area.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neural circuit of verbal humor comprehension in schizophrenia - an fMRI study.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient semantic cognition depends on accessing and selecting conceptual knowledge relevant to the current task or context. This study explored the neurocognitive architecture that supports this function by examining how individual variation in functional brain organisation predicts comprehension and semantic generation. Participants underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and, on separate days, performed written synonym judgement, and letter and category fluency tasks. We found that better synonym judgement for high frequency items was linked to greater functional coupling between posterior fusiform and anterior superior temporal cortex (aSTG), which might index orthographic-to-semantic access. However, stronger coupling between aSTG and ventromedial prefrontal cortex was associated with poor performance on the same trials, potentially reflecting greater difficulty in focussing retrieval on relevant features for high frequency items that appear in a greater range of contexts. Fluency performance was instead linked to variations in the functional coupling of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG); anterior IFG was more coupled to regions of primary visual cortex for individuals who were good at category fluency, while poor letter fluency was predicted by stronger coupling between posterior IFG and retrosplenial cortex. These results show that individual differences in functional connectivity at rest predict semantic performance and are consistent with a component process account of semantic cognition in which representational information is shaped by control processes to fit the current requirements, in both comprehension and fluency tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.