Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27662589›Full record

ArticleBrain and cognition2016

An individual differences analysis of the neurocognitive architecture of the semantic system at rest.

Giovanna Mollo, Theodoros Karapanagiotidis, Boris C Bernhardt, Charlotte E Murphy, Jonathan Smallwood, Elizabeth Jefferies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and cognition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giovanna MolloDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom. Electronic address: giovanna.mollo@york.ac.uk.
Theodoros KarapanagiotidisDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
Boris C BernhardtMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Charlotte E MurphyDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J006963/1CIHREuropean Research Council 283530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient semantic cognition depends on accessing and selecting conceptual knowledge relevant to the current task or context. This study explored the neurocognitive architecture that supports this function by examining how individual variation in functional brain organisation predicts comprehension and semantic generation. Participants underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and, on separate days, performed written synonym judgement, and letter and category fluency tasks. We found that better synonym judgement for high frequency items was linked to greater functional coupling between posterior fusiform and anterior superior temporal cortex (aSTG), which might index orthographic-to-semantic access. However, stronger coupling between aSTG and ventromedial prefrontal cortex was associated with poor performance on the same trials, potentially reflecting greater difficulty in focussing retrieval on relevant features for high frequency items that appear in a greater range of contexts. Fluency performance was instead linked to variations in the functional coupling of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG); anterior IFG was more coupled to regions of primary visual cortex for individuals who were good at category fluency, while poor letter fluency was predicted by stronger coupling between posterior IFG and retrosplenial cortex. These results show that individual differences in functional connectivity at rest predict semantic performance and are consistent with a component process account of semantic cognition in which representational information is shaped by control processes to fit the current requirements, in both comprehension and fluency tasks.

Indexed as

IndividualitySemanticsAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetYoung AdultAnterior temporal lobeFunctional connectivityInferior frontal gyrusSemanticsVerbal fluencyVisual word form area

Identifiers

PMID27662589
PMCPMC5090046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.