ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2017
Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: A View of the Regulatory Science Qualification Landscape from the Coalition Against Major Diseases CSF Biomarker Team.
Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood-based multiplex nanobiosensing of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: from nanoengineered ınterfaces to clinical translation.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Plasma protein risk scores for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease in the Framingham heart study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Early onset diagnosis in Alzheimer's disease patients via amyloid-β oligomers-sensing probe in cerebrospinal fluid.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Comparison of Commonly Measured Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins and Their Significance for the Characterization of Cognitive Impairment Status.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- The retinal ganglion cell layer reflects neurodegenerative changes in cognitively unimpaired individuals.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2022Article
- Review
- Moving fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease from research tools to routine clinical diagnostics.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2021Review
- Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease-preparing for a new era of disease-modifying therapies.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Review
- Biomarkers for the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: Metabolomics Analysis of Brain Tissue and Blood.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Three plasma metabolites in elderly patients differentiate mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020Article
- Biomarkers: Opportunities and Challenges for Drug Development in the Current Regulatory Landscape.Biomarker insights · 2020Review
- New directions in clinical trials for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Methods and outcome measures.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2020Article
- Traditional Chinese medicine for anti-Alzheimer's disease: berberine and evodiamine fromChinese medicine · 2020Review
- Racial Disparity in Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid and Tau Biomarkers and Associated Cutoffs for Mild Cognitive Impairment.JAMA network open · 2019Observational
- Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for understanding multiple aspects of Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Current state of Alzheimer's fluid biomarkers.Acta neuropathologica · 2018Review
- A Critical Evaluation of Wet Biomarkers for Huntington's Disease: Current Status and Ways Forward.Journal of Huntington's disease · 2018Review
- Amyloid, tau, pathogen infection and antimicrobial protection in Alzheimer's disease -conformist, nonconformist, and realistic prospects for AD pathogenesis.Translational neurodegeneration · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) drug development is burdened with the current requirement to conduct large, lengthy, and costly trials to overcome uncertainty in patient progression and effect size on treatment outcome measures. There is an urgent need for the discovery, development, and implementation of novel, objectively measured biomarkers for AD that would aid selection of the appropriate subpopulation of patients in clinical trials, and presumably, improve the likelihood of successfully evaluating innovative treatment options. Amyloid deposition and tau in the brain, which are most commonly assessed either in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or by molecular imaging, are consistently and widely accepted. Nonetheless, a clear gap still exists in the accurate identification of subjects that truly have the hallmarks of AD. The Coalition Against Major Diseases (CAMD), one of 12 consortia of the Critical Path Institute (C-Path), aims to streamline drug development for AD and related dementias by advancing regulatory approved drug development tools for clinical trials through precompetitive data sharing and adoption of consensus clinical data standards. This report focuses on the regulatory process for biomarker qualification, briefly comments on how it contrasts with approval or clearance of companion diagnostics, details the qualifications currently available to the field of AD, and highlights the current challenges facing the landscape of CSF biomarkers qualified as hallmarks of AD. Finally, it recommends actions to accelerate regulatory qualification of CSF biomarkers that would, in turn, improve the efficiency of AD therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.