Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27661780›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2017

Using long-term experimental evolution to uncover the patterns and determinants of molecular evolution of an Escherichia coli natural isolate in the streptomycin-treated mouse gut.

Mathilde Lescat, Adrien Launay, Mohamed Ghalayini, Mélanie Magnan, Jérémy Glodt, Coralie Pintard, Sara Dion, Erick Denamur, Olivier Tenaillon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Genetic mutation inmSystems · 2024
    Article
  9. Intrahost evolution of the gut microbiota.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Predicting the effect of mutations to investigate recent events of selection across 60,472Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Shared Evolutionary Path in Social Microbiomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  12. Within-host evolution of the gut microbiome.Current opinion in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Emergent evolutionary forces in spatial models of luminal growth and their application to the human gut microbiota.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mathilde LescatINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Adrien LaunayINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Mohamed GhalayiniINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Mélanie MagnanINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Jérémy GlodtINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Coralie PintardINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Sara DionINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Erick DenamurINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Olivier TenaillonINSERM, IAME, UMR 1137, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Paris Cité · FRInserm · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

European Research Council 310944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although microbial ecology of the gut is now a major focus of interest, little is known about the molecular determinants of microbial adaptation in the gut. Experimental evolution coupled with whole-genome sequencing can provide insights of the adaptive process. In vitro experiments have revealed some conserved patterns: intermediate convergence, and epistatic interactions between beneficial mutations and mutations in global regulators. To test the relevance of these patterns and to identify the selective pressures acting in vivo, we have performed a long-term adaptation of an E. coli natural isolate, the streptomycin-resistant strain 536, in the digestive tract of streptomycin-treated mice. After a year of evolution, a clone from 15 replicates was sequenced. Consistently with in vitro observations, the identified mutations revealed a strong pattern of convergence at the mutation, gene, operon and functional levels. Yet, the rate of molecular evolution was lower than in in vitro, and no mutations in global regulators were recovered. More specific targets were observed: the dgo operon, involved in the galactonate pathway that improved growth on D-galactonate, and rluD and gidB, implicated in the maturation of the ribosomes, which mutations improved growth only in the presence of streptomycin. As in vitro, the nonrandom associations of mutations within the same pathways suggested a role of epistasis in shaping the adaptive landscape. Overall, we show that 'evolve and sequence' approach coupled with an analysis of convergence, when applied to a natural isolate, can be used to study adaptation in vivo and uncover the specific selective pressures of that environment.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalEvolution, MolecularAnimalsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFemaleGastrointestinal TractGenes, BacterialMiceMutationOperonStreptomycinStreptomycin536D-galactonateEscherichia coliexperimental evolutiongut colonization mouse modelstreptomycin resistance

Identifiers

PMID27661780
PMCPMC5734618
OpenAlexW2522101239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.