Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27660766›Full record

ReviewBurns & trauma2016

The physical and physiological effects of vacuum massage on the different skin layers: a current status of the literature.

Peter Moortgat, Mieke Anthonissen, Jill Meirte, Ulrike Van Daele, Koen Maertens

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Burns & trauma, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Towards the Development of a Device for Assessing the Pliability of Burn Scars.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter MoortgatOSCARE, Organisation for Burns, Scar After-care and Research, Van Roiestraat 18, B-2170 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6840-762X
Mieke AnthonissenOSCARE, Organisation for Burns, Scar After-care and Research, Van Roiestraat 18, B-2170 Antwerp, Belgium ; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, box 1500, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Jill MeirteOSCARE, Organisation for Burns, Scar After-care and Research, Van Roiestraat 18, B-2170 Antwerp, Belgium ; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Ulrike Van DaeleDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
Koen MaertensOSCARE, Organisation for Burns, Scar After-care and Research, Van Roiestraat 18, B-2170 Antwerp, Belgium ; Department of Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEKU Leuven · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vacuum massage is a non-invasive mechanical massage technique performed with a mechanical device that lifts the skin by means of suction, creates a skin fold and mobilises that skin fold. In the late 1970s, this therapy was introduced to treat traumatic or burn scars. Although vacuum massage was invented to treat burns and scars, one can find very little literature on the effects of this intervention. Therefore, the aim of this review is to present an overview of the available literature on the physical and physiological effects of vacuum massage on epidermal and dermal skin structures in order to find the underlying working mechanisms that could benefit the healing of burns and scars. The discussion contains translational analysis of the results and provides recommendations for future research on the topic. An extended search for publications was performed using PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Two authors independently identified and checked each study against the inclusion criteria. Nineteen articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. The two most reported physical effects of vacuum massage were improvement of the tissue hardness and the elasticity of the skin. Besides physical effects, a variety of physiological effects are reported in literature, for example, an increased number of fibroblasts and collagen fibres accompanied by an alteration of fibroblast phenotype and collagen orientation. Little information was found on the decrease of pain and itch due to vacuum massage. Although vacuum massage initially had been developed for the treatment of burn scars, this literature review found little evidence for the efficacy of this treatment. Variations in duration, amplitude or frequency of the treatment have a substantial influence on collagen restructuring and reorientation, thus implying possible beneficial influences on the healing potential by mechanotransduction pathways. Vacuum massage may release the mechanical tension associated with scar retraction and thus induce apoptosis of myofibroblasts. Suggestions for future research include upscaling the study design, investigating the molecular pathways and dose dependency, comparing effects in different stages of repair, including evolutive parameters and the use of more objective assessment tools.

Indexed as

DepressomassageEndermologyHypertrophicInterventionPhysicalPhysiologicalScarsVacuotherapyVacuum massage

Identifiers

PMID27660766
PMCPMC5027633
OpenAlexW2507955365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.