Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27660664›Full record

ArticleForensic toxicology

Pharmacokinetics of heroin and its metabolites in vitreous humor and blood in a living pig model.

André Gottås, Marianne Arnestad, Per Steinar Halvorsen, Liliana C Bachs, Gudrun Høiseth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic toxicology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

André GottåsDivision of Forensic Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Pb 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway ; Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne ArnestadDivision of Forensic Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Pb 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
Per Steinar HalvorsenThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Liliana C BachsDivision of Forensic Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Pb 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway.
Gudrun HøisethDivision of Forensic Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Pb 4404 Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway ; Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NODiakonhjemmet Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitreous humor (VH) is an alternative matrix for drug analysis in forensic toxicology. However, little is known about the distribution of xenobiotics, such as opioids, into VH in living organisms. The aim of this study was to simultaneously measure heroin and metabolite concentrations in blood and VH after injection of heroin in a living pig model. Six pigs were under non-opioid anesthesia during the surgical operation and experiment. Ocular microdialysis was used to acquire dialysate from VH, and a venous catheter was used for blood sampling. Twenty milligrams of heroin was injected intravenously with subsequent sampling of blood and dialysate for 6 h. The samples were analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Heroin was not detected in VH; 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) and morphine were first detected in VH after 60 min. The morphine concentration in VH thereafter increased throughout the experimental period. For 6-MAM,

Indexed as

6-MAMHeroinOcular microdialysisPharmacokineticPigsVitreous humor

Identifiers

PMID27660664
PMCPMC5018035
OpenAlexW2320878215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.