Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27660608›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2016

Distribution of Response Time, Cortical, and Cardiac Correlates during Emotional Interference in Persons with Subclinical Psychotic Symptoms.

Lisa K B Holper, Alekandra Aleksandrowicz, Mario Müller, Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross, Helene Haker, Andreas J Fallgatter, Florence Hagenmuller, Wolfram Kawohl, Wulf Rössler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa K B HolperDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Alekandra AleksandrowiczDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland; The Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland.
Mario MüllerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland; The Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland.
Vladeta Ajdacic-GrossDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Helene HakerThe Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland; Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH ZurichSwitzerland.
Andreas J FallgatterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of TübingenTübingen, Germany; LEAD Graduate School, University of TübingenTübingen, Germany.
Florence HagenmullerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland; The Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland.
Wolfram KawohlDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland; The Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland.
Wulf RösslerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland; The Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services, University Hospital of Psychiatry ZurichZurich, Switzerland; Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University MedicineBerlin, Germany.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHETH Zurich · CHUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A psychosis phenotype can be observed below the threshold of clinical detection. The study aimed to investigate whether subclinical psychotic symptoms are associated with deficits in controlling emotional interference, and whether cortical brain and cardiac correlates of these deficits can be detected using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). A data set derived from a community sample was obtained from the Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services. 174 subjects (mean age 29.67 ± 6.41, 91 females) were assigned to four groups ranging from low to high levels of subclinical psychotic symptoms (derived from the Symptom Checklist-90-R). Emotional interference was assessed using the emotional Stroop task comprising neutral, positive, and negative conditions. Statistical distributional methods based on delta plots [behavioral response time (RT) data] and quantile analysis (fNIRS data) were applied to evaluate the emotional interference effects. Results showed that both interference effects and disorder-specific (i.e., group-specific) effects could be detected, based on behavioral RTs, cortical hemodynamic signals (brain correlates), and heart rate variability (cardiac correlates). Subjects with high compared to low subclinical psychotic symptoms revealed significantly reduced amplitudes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (interference effect, p < 0.001) and middle temporal gyrus (disorder-specific group effect, p < 0.001), supported by behavioral and heart rate results. The present findings indicate that distributional analyses methods can support the detection of emotional interference effects in the emotional Stroop. The results suggested that subjects with high subclinical psychosis exhibit enhanced emotional interference effects. Based on these observations, subclinical psychosis may therefore prove to represent a valid extension of the clinical psychosis phenotype.

Indexed as

delta plotemotional StroopepidemiologyfNIRSparanoid ideationpsychoticismquantile analysis

Identifiers

PMID27660608
PMCPMC5014856
OpenAlexW2507882794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.