Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27660506›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2016

Monitoring Metastasis and Cachexia in a Patient with Breast Cancer: A Case Study.

Nikita Consul, Xiaotao Guo, Courtney Coker, Sara Lopez-Pintado, Hanina Hibshoosh, Binsheng Zhao, Kevin Kalinsky, Swarnali Acharyya

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Metastasis and cachexia: alongside in clinics, but not so in animal models.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikita ConsulDepartment of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University.
Xiaotao GuoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Courtney CokerInstitute for Cancer Genetics, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sara Lopez-PintadoDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Hanina HibshooshDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Binsheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kevin KalinskyDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Swarnali AcharyyaInstitute for Cancer Genetics, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USRoyal College of Physicians · GB

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000081 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$3.3M
Defining mechanisms of cancer chemoresistance and metastasisR00CA172697 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ACHARYYA, SWARNALI · 2014 to 2016
$737k
Defining mechanisms of cancer chemoresistance and metastasisK99CA172697 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ACHARYYA, SWARNALI · 2013 to 2013
$159k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000081NCI NIH HHS K99 CA172697NCI NIH HHS R00 CA172697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cachexia, a wasting syndrome associated with advanced cancer and metastasis, is rarely documented in breast cancer patients. However, the incidence of cachexia in breast cancer is now thought to be largely underestimated. In our case report of a breast cancer patient with bone metastasis monitored during the course of her treatment, we document the development of cachexia by image analysis in relation to her metastatic burden. Elucidation of the link between metastatic burden and cachexia could unveil a highly specific screening process for metastasis, by assessing true muscle mass loss. Our patient was a 49-year-old premenopausal woman, with metastatic invasive ductal breast carcinoma in the vertebral and iliac bones on presentation, which progressed with new metastases to her hips, thigh bones, and vertebrae. In the two-year period, that is between her diagnosis and death, she lost >10% of her baseline weight. During these two years, we retrospectively identified a decrease in paraspinal muscle (PM) at the third lumbar vertebra followed by a sharp decline in weight. The increased tumor burden over time in metastatic sites was accompanied by a decrease in abdominal muscle and visceral and subcutaneous fat and was followed by the patient's demise. The increasing tumor burden in the patient was correlated with the mass of other tissues to determine the tissue that could best serve as a surrogate marker to cachexia and tumor burden. We noted a strong negative correlation between PM area and metastatic tumor area at the third lumbar vertebral level, with PM loss correlating to increasing tumor burden. The monitoring of PM wasting may serve as a marker, and therefore a prognostic factor, for both cachexia and extent of metastatic disease, especially in breast cancer, where metastasis to bone is frequent. Based on our data and review of the literature in this case study, longitudinal monitoring of cachexia in the selected muscle groups can give clinicians early indications of the extent of cachexia in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

bone metastasisbreast cancercachexiaradiological quantificationvertebral metastasisweight loss

Identifiers

PMID27660506
PMCPMC5019129
OpenAlexW2517906931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.