Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27660444›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine

Experimental bladder regeneration using a poly-l-lactide/silk fibroin scaffold seeded with nanoparticle-labeled allogenic bone marrow stromal cells.

Natalia M Yudintceva, Yulia A Nashchekina, Miralda I Blinova, Nadezhda V Orlova, Alexandr N Muraviov, Tatiana I Vinogradova, Magomed G Sheykhov, Elena Y Shapkova, Dmitriy V Emeljannikov, Petr K Yablonskii and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Natalia M YudintcevaDepartment of Cell Culture, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS).
Yulia A NashchekinaDepartment of Cell Culture, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS); Nanotechnology and Telecommunications, Institute of Physics, Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University.
Miralda I BlinovaDepartment of Cell Culture, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS).
Nadezhda V OrlovaDepartment of Urology, Federal State Institution Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Alexandr N MuraviovDepartment of Urology, Federal State Institution Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Tatiana I VinogradovaDepartment of Urology, Federal State Institution Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Magomed G SheykhovDepartment of Urology, Federal State Institution Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Elena Y ShapkovaDepartment of Urology, Federal State Institution Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Dmitriy V EmeljannikovDepartment of Urology, Federal State Institution Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia.
Petr K YablonskiiDepartment of Urology, Federal State Institution Saint Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Faculty of Medicine, Federal State Budgetary Institute.
Igor A SamusenkoDepartment of Pathology, Federal State Budgetary Institute "Nikiforov Russian Centre of Emergency and Radiation Medicine" of the Ministry of Health of Russia.
Anastasiya L MikhrinaDepartment of Pathomorphology, I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Science.
Artem V PakhomovDepartment of Radiology, Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Center.
Maxim A ShevtsovDepartment of Cell Culture, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS); Department of Radiology, Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Center; Department of Experimental Medicine, First I.P. Pavlov State Medical University of St Petersburg, St Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, a poly-l-lactide/silk fibroin (PL-SF) bilayer scaffold seeded with allogenic bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) was investigated as a potential approach for bladder tissue engineering in a model of partial bladder wall cystectomy in rabbits. The inner porous layer of the scaffold produced from silk fibroin was designed to promote cell proliferation and the outer layer produced from poly-l-lactic acid to serve as a waterproof barrier. To compare the feasibility and efficacy of BMSC application in the reconstruction of bladder defects, 12 adult male rabbits were divided into experimental and control groups (six animals each) that received a scaffold seeded with BMSCs or an acellular one, respectively. For BMSC tracking in the graft in in vivo studies using magnetic resonance imaging, cells were labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. In vitro studies demonstrated high intracellular incorporation of nanoparticles and the absence of a toxic influence on BMSC viability and proliferation. Following implantation of the graft with BMSCs into the bladder, we observed integration of the scaffold with surrounding bladder tissues (as detected by magnetic resonance imaging). During the follow-up period of 12 weeks, labeled BMSCs resided in the implanted scaffold. The functional activity of the reconstructed bladder was confirmed by electromyography. Subsequent histological assay demonstrated enhanced biointegrative properties of the PL-SF scaffold with cells in comparison to the control graft, as related to complete regeneration of the smooth muscle and urothelium tissues in the implant. Confocal microscopy studies confirmed the presence of the superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-labeled BMSCs in newly formed bladder layers, thus indicating the role of stem cells in bladder regeneration. The results of this study demonstrate that application of a PL-SF scaffold seeded with allogenic BMSCs can enhance biointegration of the graft in vivo and support bladder tissue regeneration and function.

Indexed as

bladderbone marrow stromal cellsscaffoldstem cellssuperparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticlestissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID27660444
PMCPMC5019275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.