Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27660410›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Visual outcome after emergency surgery for open globe eye injury in Japan.

Ai Toride, Hiroshi Toshida, Asaki Matsui, Yusuke Matsuzaki, Rio Honda, Toshihiko Ohta, Akira Murakami

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ai TorideDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka; Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital.
Hiroshi ToshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka.
Asaki MatsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka.
Yusuke MatsuzakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka.
Rio HondaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka; Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiko OhtaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka.
Akira MurakamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital · JPJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with open globe eye injury are brought to hospital as emergency patients and usually require admission for emergency surgery. We analyzed the visual outcome in patients with open globe eye injury at our hospital over a 4-year period. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study reviewed 40 eyes of 40 patients with open globe eye injury who were presented to Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital and required emergency surgery during the 4 years from January 2010 to December 2014. Retrospective evaluation of the visual outcome was performed using data from the medical records, including assessment of the influence of sex, side of the eye injury, cause of injury, and site/severity of injury.

resultsThe mean age (SD) at the time of the injury was 58.9 years (±25.1 years). There were 28 males (70.0%) and 12 females (30.0%). Statistically significant improvement in visual acuity after treatment was noted in the males (P=0.0015, Wilcoxon test), but not in the females. Twenty-five patients had injury to the right eye (62.5%) and 15 had injury to the left eye (37.5%). A significant improvement in visual acuity was achieved after treatment of injury to the right eye (P=0.021), but not the left eye (P=0.109). The most frequent cause of injury was an accident (15 eyes; 37.5%). The second most frequent cause was work-related injury (14 eyes; 35.0%), which only occurred in males, and the third cause was accident due to negligence (eleven eyes; 27.5%). Two patients developed sympathetic ophthalmia and one patient developed postoperative endophthalmitis.

conclusionThe majority of patients with open globe eye injury were male workers in Japan. The visual outcome of work-related injury was better than that of injury due to other causes. The visual outcome was also better if the right eye was injured compared with the left eye. Patients with injuries due to negligence were older than the other groups, and this finding might be characteristic of an aging society.

Indexed as

accidentnegligenceocular traumavisual outcomework-related injury

Identifiers

PMID27660410
PMCPMC5019441
OpenAlexW2515179915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.