Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27660400›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2017

How do individual-level sociodemographics and neighbourhood-level characteristics influence residential location behaviour in the context of the food and built environment? Findings from 25 years of follow-up in the CARDIA Study.

Pasquale E Rummo, David K Guilkey, James M Shikany, Jared P Reis, Penny Gordon-Larsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pasquale E RummoDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
David K GuilkeyDepartment of Economics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
James M ShikanyDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Jared P ReisDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Penny Gordon-LarsenDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Obesity and Metabolic Risk Disparities: Underlying Food Environment FactorsR01HL104580 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GORDON-LARSEN, PENNY · 2010 to 2014
$2.2M
Environmental Changes and Health Outcomes across 25 Years: Four US CitiesR01HL114091 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GORDON-LARSEN, PENNY · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200900041CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300025CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300026CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300027CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300028CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300029CNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104580NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114091NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about how diet-related and activity-related amenities relate to residential location behaviour. Understanding these relationships is essential for addressing residential self-selection bias.

methodsUsing 25 years (6 examinations) of data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study (n=11 013 observations) and linked neighbourhood-level data from the 4 CARDIA baseline cities (Birmingham, Alabama; Chicago, Illinois; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Oakland, California, USA), we characterised participants' neighbourhoods as having low, average or high road connectivity and amenities using non-hierarchical cluster analysis. We then used repeated measures multinomial logistic regression with random effects to examine the associations between individual-level sociodemographics and neighbourhood-level characteristics with residential neighbourhood types over the 25-year period, and whether these associations differed by individual-level income.

resultsBeing female was positively associated with living in neighbourhoods with low (vs high) road connectivity and activity-related and diet-related amenities among high-income individuals only. At all income levels, a higher percentage of neighbourhood white population and neighbourhood population <18 years were associated with living in neighbourhoods with low (vs high) connectivity and amenities. Individual-level race; age; and educational attainment, neighbourhood socioeconomic status and housing prices did not influence residential location behaviour related to neighbourhood connectivity and amenities at any income level.

conclusionsNeighbourhood-level factors appeared to play a comparatively greater role in shaping residential location behaviour than individual-level sociodemographics. Our study is an important step in understanding how residential locational behaviour relates to amenities and physical activity opportunities, and may help mitigate residential self-selection bias in built environment studies.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorResidence CharacteristicsSocial ClassAdolescentAdultDemographyDietExerciseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesSex FactorsUnited StatesDIETEPIDEMIOLOGYNeighborhood/placePHYSICAL ACTIVITYSOCIAL INEQUALITIES

Identifiers

PMID27660400
PMCPMC5318652
OpenAlexW2521712195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.