Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27659562›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2016

Computational Redesign of Thioredoxin Is Hypersensitive toward Minor Conformational Changes in the Backbone Template.

Kristoffer E Johansson, Nicolai Tidemand Johansen, Signe Christensen, Scott Horowitz, James C A Bardwell, Johan G Olsen, Martin Willemoës, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg, Thomas Hamelryck and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Accurate protein stability predictions from homology models.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Knowledge-Based Unfolded State Model for Protein Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kristoffer E Johansson *Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Nicolai Tidemand Johansen *Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Signe ChristensenLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Scott HorowitzHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
James C A BardwellHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Johan G OlsenLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Martin WillemoësLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Kresten Lindorff-LarsenLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Jesper Ferkinghoff-BorgBiotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Thomas HamelryckSection for Computational and RNA Biology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.
Jakob R WintherLinderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark.

Funding

Mechanism of an Acid Activated ChaperoneR01GM102829 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARDWELL, JAMES, JAKOB, URSULA H. · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the development of powerful computational tools, the full-sequence design of proteins still remains a challenging task. To investigate the limits and capabilities of computational tools, we conducted a study of the ability of the program Rosetta to predict sequences that recreate the authentic fold of thioredoxin. Focusing on the influence of conformational details in the template structures, we based our study on 8 experimentally determined template structures and generated 120 designs from each. For experimental evaluation, we chose six sequences from each of the eight templates by objective criteria. The 48 selected sequences were evaluated based on their progressive ability to (1) produce soluble protein in Escherichia coli and (2) yield stable monomeric protein, and (3) on the ability of the stable, soluble proteins to adopt the target fold. Of the 48 designs, we were able to synthesize 32, 20 of which resulted in soluble protein. Of these, only two were sufficiently stable to be purified. An X-ray crystal structure was solved for one of the designs, revealing a close resemblance to the target structure. We found a significant difference among the eight template structures to realize the above three criteria despite their high structural similarity. Thus, in order to improve the success rate of computational full-sequence design methods, we recommend that multiple template structures are used. Furthermore, this study shows that special care should be taken when optimizing the geometry of a structure prior to computational design when using a method that is based on rigid conformations.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayProtein ConformationProtein StabilitySolubilityThioredoxinsThioredoxinscomputational protein designde novo protein designprotein foldingprotein stabilityRosetta

Identifiers

PMID27659562
PMCPMC5242314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.