ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2017
Left ventricular non-compaction and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: the significant diagnostic value of longitudinal strain.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Searching for genetic determinants for left ventricular non-compaction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Myocardial Mechanics and Associated Valvular and Vascular Abnormalities in Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Position Statement on the Use of Myocardial Strain in Cardiology Routines by the Brazilian Society of Cardiology's Department Of Cardiovascular Imaging - 2023.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Multimodality Imaging and Biomarker Approach to Characterize the Pathophysiology of Heart Failure in Left Ventricular Non-Compaction with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of Ebstein's Anomaly with Left Ventricular Noncompaction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in Cardiomyopathies: From Diagnosis to Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The mitral regurgitation effects of cardiac structure and function in left ventricular noncompaction.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Speckle tracking echocardiography and left ventricular twist mechanics: predictive capabilities for noncompaction cardiomyopathy in the first degree relatives.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- The pivotal role of cardiovascular imaging in the identification and risk stratification of non-compaction cardiomyopathy patients.Heart failure reviews · 2020Review
- Limitations in the Diagnosis of Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy by Echocardiography.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular non-compaction (LV NC) is characterized by abnormal trabeculations that are mainly at the LV apex. Distinction between LV NC and non-specific dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs) remains often challenging. We sought to find additive tools comparing the longitudinal strain characteristics of LVNC versus idiopathic DCM in a cohort of patients. 48 cases of LVNC (derivation cohort) were compared with 45 cases of DCM. Global and regional multi-layer (sub-endocardial, mid-wall, and sub-epicardial) LV longitudinal strain analysis was performed. Results were compared to define the best tool for distinguishing LVNC from DCM. A validation cohort (41 LVNC patients) was then used to assess the performance of the proposed diagnostic tools. In the derivation cohort, longitudinal deformation (strain) was greater in LVNC than in DCM patients. Longitudinal shortening was greater in the non-compacted segments than in the compacted ones. A mid-wall strain base-apex gradient had 88.4 % sensitivity and 66.7 % specificity in distinguishing LVNC from DCM (AUC = 0.83; cut-off of -23 or |0.23|%). In a multivariable model, the base-apex mid-wall gradient in an apical 4-chamber view was the only independent echocardiographic criteria (OR = 0.76, CI 95 % [0.66; 0.90], p = 0.0010) allowing the distinction between LVNC and DCM. In the validation cohort, the base-apex mid-wall gradient of strain had 88.4 % sensitivity, 85.7 % negative predictive values for the diagnosis of LVNC. Longitudinal strain, especially the base-apex longitudinal gradient of strain, appears as an additive valuable tool for distinguishing LVNC from DCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27659478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.