Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27659478›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2017

Left ventricular non-compaction and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: the significant diagnostic value of longitudinal strain.

Fanny Tarando, Damien Coisne, Elena Galli, Chloé Rousseau, Frédéric Viera, Christian Bosseau, Gilbert Habib, Mathieu Lederlin, Frédéric Schnell, Erwan Donal

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Searching for genetic determinants for left ventricular non-compaction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Systematic Review of Ebstein's Anomaly with Left Ventricular Noncompaction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fanny TarandoService de Cardiologie and CIC-IT 1414, Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Damien CoisneService de Cardiologie, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Elena GalliService de Cardiologie and CIC-IT 1414, Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Chloé RousseauCIC-P 1414, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Frédéric VieraService de Cardiologie, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Christian BosseauService de Cardiologie and CIC-IT 1414, Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France.
Gilbert HabibService de Cardiologie, CHU Marseille, Marseille, France.
Mathieu LederlinService de Cardiologie, CHU Marseille, Marseille, France.
Frédéric SchnellLTSI, INSERM 1099, Université Rennes-1, Rennes, France.
Erwan DonalService de Cardiologie and CIC-IT 1414, Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, 35000, Rennes, France. erwan.donal@chu-rennes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular non-compaction (LV NC) is characterized by abnormal trabeculations that are mainly at the LV apex. Distinction between LV NC and non-specific dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs) remains often challenging. We sought to find additive tools comparing the longitudinal strain characteristics of LVNC versus idiopathic DCM in a cohort of patients. 48 cases of LVNC (derivation cohort) were compared with 45 cases of DCM. Global and regional multi-layer (sub-endocardial, mid-wall, and sub-epicardial) LV longitudinal strain analysis was performed. Results were compared to define the best tool for distinguishing LVNC from DCM. A validation cohort (41 LVNC patients) was then used to assess the performance of the proposed diagnostic tools. In the derivation cohort, longitudinal deformation (strain) was greater in LVNC than in DCM patients. Longitudinal shortening was greater in the non-compacted segments than in the compacted ones. A mid-wall strain base-apex gradient had 88.4 % sensitivity and 66.7 % specificity in distinguishing LVNC from DCM (AUC = 0.83; cut-off of -23 or |0.23|%). In a multivariable model, the base-apex mid-wall gradient in an apical 4-chamber view was the only independent echocardiographic criteria (OR = 0.76, CI 95 % [0.66; 0.90], p = 0.0010) allowing the distinction between LVNC and DCM. In the validation cohort, the base-apex mid-wall gradient of strain had 88.4 % sensitivity, 85.7 % negative predictive values for the diagnosis of LVNC. Longitudinal strain, especially the base-apex longitudinal gradient of strain, appears as an additive valuable tool for distinguishing LVNC from DCM.

Indexed as

Myocardial ContractionVentricular Function, LeftAdultAgedArea Under CurveBiomechanical PhenomenaCardiomyopathy, DilatedChi-Square DistributionDiagnosis, DifferentialEchocardiographyFemaleFranceHumansIsolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular MyocardiumMaleMiddle AgedDilated cardiomyopathyEchocardiographyLeft ventricular non-compactionLongitudinal strain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.