Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658932›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2016

Urinary Proteomics for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Diabetic Nephropathy.

G Currie, C Delles

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G CurrieInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK. Gemma.Currie@glasgow.ac.uk.
C DellesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has seen a surge in publications describing novel biomarkers for early detection of diabetic nephropathy (DN), but as yet none have outperformed albuminuria in well-designed prospective studies. This is partially attributable to our incomplete understanding of the many complex interrelated mechanisms underlying DN development, a heterogeneous process unlikely to be captured by a single biomarker. Proteomics offers the advantage of simultaneously analysing the entire protein content of a biological sample, and the technique has gained attention as a potential tool for a more accurate diagnosis of disease at an earlier stage as well as a means by which to unravel the pathogenesis of complex diseases such as DN using an untargeted approach. This review will discuss the potential of proteomics as both a clinical and research tool, evaluating exploratory work in animal models as well as diagnostic potential in human subjects.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAlbuminuriaAnimalsBiomarkersDiabetic NephropathiesEarly DiagnosisHumansProspective StudiesBiomarkersBiomarkersDiabetesNephropathyProteomicsTranslational

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.