Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658879›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2016

HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomised trial.

Robert E Booth, Jonathan M Davis, Sergey Dvoryak, John T Brewster, Oksana Lisovska, Steffanie A Strathdee, Carl A Latkin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01159704 (Peer Leaders as HIV Risk Reduction Change Agents Among Injection Drug Users), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01159704 nacompletednot on this map

Peer Leaders as HIV Risk Reduction Change Agents Among Injection Drug Users (IDUs) in Ukraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2010 to 2017Enrolled2,304ConditionsHIV Infection, HIV Risk BehaviorsArmsPeer Education Model, HIV Counseling and Education Model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert E BoothDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA. Electronic address: robert.booth@ucdenver.edu.
Jonathan M DavisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Sergey DvoryakUkrainian Institute on Public Health Policy, Kiev, Ukraine.
John T BrewsterDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Oksana LisovskaUkrainian Institute on Public Health Policy, Kiev, Ukraine.
Steffanie A StrathdeeGlobal Health Institute, University of California San Diego Department of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Carl A LatkinDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USUkrainian Institute of Public Health Policy · UAJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Impact of Drug Policy Reform on the HIV Risk Environment among IDUs in TijuanaR37DA019829 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI STRATHDEE, STEFFANIE A. · 2010 to 2019
$6.7M
Peer Leaders as HIV Risk Reduction Change Agents Among IDUs in UkraineR01DA026739 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BOOTH, ROBERT EDWIN · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026739NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA019829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV prevalence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine is among the highest in the world. In this study, we aimed to assess whether a social network intervention was superior to HIV testing and counselling in affecting HIV incidence among PWID. Although this was not the primary aim of the study, it is associated with reducing drug and sex risk behaviours, which were primary aims.

methodsIn this clustered randomised trial, PWID who were 16 years of age or older, had used self-reported drug injection in the past 30 days, were willing to be interviewed for about 1 hour and tested for HIV, were not too impaired to comprehend and provide informed consent, and, for this paper, who tested HIV negative at baseline were recruited from the streets by project outreach workers in three cities in southern and eastern Ukraine: Odessa, Donetsk, and Nikolayev. Index or peer leaders, along with two of their network members, were randomly assigned (1:1) by the study statistician to the testing and counselling block (control group) or the testing and counselling plus a social network intervention block (intervention group). No stratification or minimisation was done. Participants in the network intervention received five sessions to train their network members in risk reduction. Those participants assigned to the control group received no further intervention after counselling. The main outcome of this study was HIV seroconversion in the intent-to-treat population as estimated with Cox regression and incorporating a γ frailty term to account for clustering. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT01159704.

findingsBetween July 12, 2010, and Nov 23, 2012, 2304 PWIDs were recruited, 1200 of whom were HIV negative and are included in the present study. 589 index or peer leaders were randomly assigned to the control group and 611 were assigned to the intervention group. Of the 1200 HIV-negative participants, 1085 (90%) were retained at 12 months. In 553·0 person-years in the intervention group, 102 participants had seroconversion (incidence density 18·45 per 100 person-years; 95% CI 14·87-22·03); in 497·1 person-years in the control group 158 participants seroconverted (31·78 per 100 person-years; 26·83-36·74). This corresponded to a reduced hazard in the intervention group (hazard ratio 0·53, 95% CI 0·38-0·76, p=0·0003). No study-related adverse events were reported.

interpretationThese data provide strong support for integrating peer education into comprehensive HIV prevention programmes for PWID and suggest the value in developing and testing peer-led interventions to improve access and adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy.

fundingThe National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial SupportAdolescentAdultAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCounselingFemaleHealth EducationHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningPrevalenceRisk Reduction BehaviorSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID27658879
PMCPMC5101021
OpenAlexW2496898371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.