Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658710›Full record

ReviewImmunology2017

Antigen processing and immune regulation in the response to tumours.

Emma Reeves, Edward James

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Revisiting tumor immunogenicity through the lens of mutant p53: Implications for cancer immunotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Aberrant SUMOylation Restricts the Targetable Cancer Immunopeptidome.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The expression of ERAP1 is favorable for the prognosis and immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: a study based on the bioinformatic and immunohistochemical analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma ReevesCancer Sciences Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Edward JamesCancer Sciences Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MHC class I and II antigen processing and presentation pathways display peptides to circulating CD8

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationAnimalsCancer VaccinesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicHumansImmunomodulationLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingNeoplasmsTumor EscapeCancer Vaccinesantigen processing and presentationcancer immunologyMHC

Identifiers

PMID27658710
PMCPMC5341504
OpenAlexW2523290953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.