Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658666›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hospital infection2017

Point-of-care universal screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a cluster-randomized cross-over trial.

P J Wu, D Jeyaratnam, O Tosas, B S Cooper, G L French

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hospital infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

P J WuDepartment of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
D JeyaratnamDepartment of Microbiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: d.jeyaratnam@nhs.net.
O TosasCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, London, UK.
B S CooperCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, London, UK.
G L FrenchDepartment of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Infectious Disease, King's College London, School of Medicine, London, UK.
University of Oxford · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College School · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is frequently endemic in healthcare settings and may be transmitted by person-to-person spread. Asymptomatic MRSA carriers are potential, unsuspected sources for transmission and some of them may be identified by admission screening.

aimTo assess whether rapid point-of-care screening (POCS) for MRSA at hospital admission may be associated with a reduction in MRSA acquisition rates when compared with slower laboratory-based methods.

methodsA cluster-randomized cross-over trial was conducted in four admission wards of an acute London tertiary care hospital. Polymerase chain reaction-based POCS screening was compared with conventional culture screening. Patients were screened on ward admission and discharge, and the MRSA acquisition rate on the admission wards was calculated as the primary outcome measure.

resultsIn all, 10,017 patients were included; 4978 in the control arm, 5039 in the POCS arm. The MRSA carriage rate on admission was 1.7%. POCS reduced the median reporting time from 40.4 to 3.7 h (P < 0.001). MRSA was acquired on the admission wards by 23 (0.46%) patients in the control arm and by 24 (0.48%) in the intervention arm, acquisition rates of 5.39 and 4.60 per 1000 days respectively. After taking account of predefined confounding factors, the adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) for change in trend for MRSA acquisition was 0.961 (95% confidence interval: 0.766-1.206). The adjusted IRR for step change for MRSA acquisition was 0.98 (0.304-3.162).

conclusionPOCS produces a significantly faster result but has no effect on MRSA acquisition on admission wards compared with culture screening. Where compliance with infection prevention and control is high and MRSA carriage is low, POCS has no additional impact on MRSA acquisition rates over the first one to four days of admission compared with conventional culture screening.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdultAgedBacteriological TechniquesCarrier StateCross-Over StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansLondonMaleMass ScreeningMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionStaphylococcal InfectionsMeticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusPoint of careRapid screeningScreening

Identifiers

PMID27658666
PMCPMC5384532
OpenAlexW2522611710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.