Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658636›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2016

Oxygen availability and metabolic adaptations.

Michael S Nakazawa, Brian Keith, M Celeste Simon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 236 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
236citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

236 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 437 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Hollow MnOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael S NakazawaAbramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Brian KeithAbramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
M Celeste SimonAbramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Cancer Research Institute · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL CONTROL IN ADAPTATION TO HYPOXIAP01CA104838 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DIEHL, JOHN ALAN · 2004 to 2018
$17.6M
HIFs and VEGF in sarcoma progression, metastasis, and radiation responseR01CA158301 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SIMON, M. CELESTE, YOON, SAM SUNGHYUN · 2011 to 2021
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA104838NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxygen availability, along with the abundance of nutrients (such as glucose, glutamine, lipids and albumin), fluctuates significantly during tumour evolution and the recruitment of blood vessels, leukocytes and reactive fibroblasts to complex tumour microenvironments. As such, hypoxia and concomitant nutrient scarcity affect large gene expression programmes, signalling pathways, diverse metabolic reactions and various stress responses. This Review summarizes our current understanding of how these adaptations are integrated in hypoxic tumour cells and their role in disease progression.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalHumansNeoplasmsOxygenTumor MicroenvironmentOxygen

Identifiers

PMID27658636
PMCPMC5546320
OpenAlexW2521282167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.