Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Tooth wear as a means to quantify intra-specific variations in diet and chewing movements.

Ivan Calandra, Gaëlle Labonne, Ellen Schulz-Kornas, Thomas M Kaiser, Sophie Montuire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changing perspectives on early hominin diets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molar Microwear of Narrow-Headed Vole (Microtus gregalis Pall., 1779) Depending on the Feed Abrasiveness.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivan CalandraGEGENAA - EA3795, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Gaëlle LabonneBiogéosciences - UMR CNRS 6282, Université Bourgogne Franche Comté et École Pratique des Hautes Études, Dijon, France.
Ellen Schulz-KornasMax Planck Weizmann Center for Integrative Archaeology and Anthropology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas M KaiserEvolutionary Biology and Paleoanthropology, Center of Natural History, Hamburg, Germany.
Sophie MontuireBiogéosciences - UMR CNRS 6282, Université Bourgogne Franche Comté et École Pratique des Hautes Études, PSL Research University, Dijon, France.
Université de Bourgogne · FRInstitut de Recherche sur les ArchéoMATériaux · FRMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, tooth function, and its efficiency, depends both on the mechanical properties of the food and on chewing dynamics. These aspects have rarely been studied in combination and/or at the intra-specific level. Here we applied 3D dental surface texture analysis to a sample of field voles (Microtus agrestis) trapped from Finnish Lapland at different seasons and localities to test for inter-population variations. We also explored intra-individual variation in chewing dynamics by analysing two facets on the second upper molars. Our results confirm that the two localities have similar environments and that the voles feed on the same items there. On the other hand, the texture data suggest that diets are seasonally variable, probably due to varying concentrations of abrasives. Lastly, the textures on the buccal facets are more isotropic and their direction deviates more from the mesial chewing direction than the lingual facets. We interpret these results as reflecting food, rather than chewing, movements, where food particles are more guided on the lingual side of the molars. This has implications for the application of dental microwear analysis to fossils: only homologous facets can be compared, even when the molar row seems to constitute a functional unit.

Identifiers

PMID27658531
PMCPMC5034321
OpenAlexW2523484121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.