Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658472›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016

The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Christian Doehn, Viktor Grünwald, Thomas Steiner, Markus Follmann, Heidrun Rexer, Susanne Krege

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2020
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identifying a Novel BiomarkerJournal of Cancer · 2018
    Article
  14. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Article
  15. Renal Cell Carcinoma as an Occupational Disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian DoehnUrologikum Lübeck, Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Department of Urology, HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt GmbH, German Guideline Program in Oncology/German Cancer Society, MeckEvidence, Schwarz, Department of Urology, Urologic Onkology and Pediatric Urology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte/Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung.
Viktor Grünwald
Thomas Steiner
Markus Follmann
Heidrun Rexer
Susanne Krege
Kliniken Essen-Mitte · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2014, 15 500 persons in Germany were given the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. This disease is the third most common cancer of the urogenital system. The mean age at diagnosis is 68 years in men and 71 in men.

methodsPertinent publications up to 2014 were retrieved by a systematic literature search and reviewed in a moderated, formalized consensus process. Key questions were generated and answered by the adaptation of existing international guidelines, on the basis of an independent literature review, and by expert consensus. Representatives of 30 medical specialty societies, patient self-help groups, and other organizations participated in the process.

resultsThe search for guidelines yielded 80 hits, 23 of which were judged by DELBI to be potentially relevant; 7 were chosen for adaptation. Smoking, obesity, and hypertension increase the risk of renal cell carcinoma. Its 5-year survival rate is 75% for men and 77% for women. Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 2.6% of all deaths from cancer in men and 2.1% in women. Nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy are the standard treatments. Locally confined tumors in clinical stage T1 should be treated with kidney-preserving surgery. Minimally invasive surgery is often possible as long as the surgeon has the requisite experience. For patients with metastases, overall and progression-free survival can be prolonged with VEGF and mTOR inhibitors. The resection or irradiation of metastases can be a useful palliative treatment for patients with brain metastases or osseous metastases that are painful or increase the risk of fracture.

conclusionMinimally invasive surgery and new systemic drugs have expanded the therapeutic options for patients with renal cell carcinoma. The search for new predictive and prognostic markers is now in progress.

Indexed as

AftercareAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellClinical Decision-MakingCombined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMedical OncologyNephrectomyNephrologyPractice Guidelines as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27658472
PMCPMC5963492
OpenAlexW2526583730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.