Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658417›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2016

Optimizing therapy in inflammatory arthritis: prediction of relapse after tapering or stopping treatment for rheumatoid arthritis patients achieving clinical and radiological remission.

Y El Miedany, M El Gaafary, S Youssef, I Ahmed, Sami Bahlas, M Hegazi, A Nasr

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Y El MiedanyKing's College, London, UK. drelmiedany@rheumatology4u.com.
M El GaafaryCommunity and Public Health, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
S YoussefRheumatology & Rehab, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
I AhmedInternal Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sami BahlasRheumatology, King Abdel Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
M HegaziMedicine, Al Adan Hospital, Kuwait, Kuwait.
A NasrRadiology Department, Ain Shams Univerity, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess clinical, lab/immunological or imaging (joint ultrasonography) markers able to predict disease relapse in RA patients in sustained remission when tapering or stopping their treatment. One hundred fifty-seven RA patients in clinical remission (DAS-28 <2.6 for >6 months), receiving treatment with sDMARDs and bDMARD therapy, were randomly allocated into any of five groups: Group 1: continue full dose DMARDs and taper biologic therapy by 50 % (31 patients); Group 2: taper both DMARDs and biologic therapy dose by 50 % (32 patients); Group 3: taper DMARDs by 50 % and stop biologic therapy (31 patients); Group 4: stop both DMARDs and biologic therapy (31 patients); Group 5: continue medications without change (31 patients). Forty joints were assessed ultrasonographically (DAS-28 joints + ankles + metatarsophalangeal joints) and prospectively monitored for 12 months. The primary endpoint was sustained remission for 12 months. Patients were considered as having a relapse when the DAS-28 score was >3.2 and anti-rheumatic treatment was escalated. The frequency of relapse was 41.9 % in Group 1, 59.3 % in Group 2, 67.7 % in Group 3, 77.4 % in Group 4 and 6.5 % in Group 5. Relapse rates were significantly higher in patients whose ultrasound scores raised within 3 months of stopping their medications (P < 0.001 for both GS and PD scores). Cox regression identified ACPA positivity (at baseline) and progression of functional disability (at 2 months) as predictors for relapse. Tapering therapy is feasible in RA patients. Tailored dynamic approach is advised. Joint ultrasonographic assessment, ACPA positivity and worsening functional disability predicted relapse within a short term after discontinuation of the treatment. RA patients whose DAS-28 score was <2 were more likely to remain in remission.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesBiological ProductsDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInflammationMaleMethotrexateProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRecurrenceRemission InductionAntirheumatic AgentsAutoantibodiesBiological ProductsMethotrexateEarly arthritisJointRemissionUS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.