ArticleCancer research and treatment2017
Clinically Significant Unclassified Variants in
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global prevalence and ethnic variation of pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Molecular Characterization of BRCA1 c.5339T>C Missense Mutation in DNA Damage Response of Triple-Negative Breast CancerCancers · 2022Article
- Analysis of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in the prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Clinicopathological Features of Patients with the BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.Leu1780Pro) Variant.Cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Identification of Recurrent Variants inBioMed research international · 2020Article
- Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2019Article
- A systematic review of the international prevalence ofClinical epidemiology · 2019Review
- Differences in attitudes toward genetic testing among the public, patients, and health-care professionals in Korea.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUnclassified variants (UVs) of MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 328 breast cancer patients underwent
resultsGenetic tests revealed 33 UVs in
conclusionThis study showed that comparison of genotype frequency between cases and controls could help identify UVs of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.