Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658382›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Development and performance evaluation of a recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the rapid detection of group B streptococcus.

Christina Clarke, Louise O'Connor, Heather Carré-Skinner, Olaf Piepenburg, Terry J Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Do NAAT-Based Methods Increase the Diagnostic Sensitivity ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Group B streptococcal PCR testing in comparison to culture for diagnosis of late onset bacteraemia and meningitis in infants aged 7-90 days: a multi-centre diagnostic accuracy study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina ClarkeMolecular Diagnostics Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, National Centre for Biomedical Engineering Science (NCBES), National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Louise O'ConnorMolecular Diagnostics Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, National Centre for Biomedical Engineering Science (NCBES), National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. louise.oconnor@nuigalway.ie.
Heather Carré-SkinnerTwistDx Limited, Cambridge, UK.
Olaf PiepenburgTwistDx Limited, Cambridge, UK.
Terry J SmithMolecular Diagnostics Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, National Centre for Biomedical Engineering Science (NCBES), National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IETwistDx (United Kingdom) · GBNational University of Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the implementation of prevention guidelines, group B Streptococcal (GBS) infection remains a leading cause of sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis, resulting in significant neonatal morbidity and mortality. Preventive approaches that identify women at risk of transmitting GBS have reduced the incidence of neonatal GBS disease, and dramatically decreased the associated mortality rates. However, there is an on-going requirement for a near-patient diagnostic test for GBS that can be carried out at the time of delivery, ideally in the labour ward setting, particularly for women of unknown GBS colonisation status at the time of delivery.

methodsIn this study, a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) assay was developed and performance evaluated for the detection of group B Streptococcus in vaginal swabs. The assay uses the cAMP factor (cfb) gene of GBS as the target gene. The analytical performance of the assay was evaluated by testing a panel of GBS reference strains and clinical isolates, and non-GBS organisms. The limit of detection was determined and the clinical performance was evaluated by testing 124 vaginal swabs from women with both GBS positive and negative status.

resultsBased on specificity testing carried out the assay was shown to be specific for the target of interest. The limit of detection of the assay was shown to be between six and 12 genome copies and was comparable to that of a real-time PCR assay, both achieving a limit of detection below 12.5 genome copies. The performance of both assays when applied to clinical samples was identical.

conclusionA specific, sensitive RPA assay for GBS was developed. The performance of the assay for testing of clinical samples is within the acceptable range.

Indexed as

GBSGroup B StreptococcusLabourLimit of detectionNear-patient testsNeonatal infectionNeonatesPoint-of-careRecombinase Polymerase AmplificationSpecificity

Identifiers

PMID27658382
PMCPMC5034592
OpenAlexW2521320790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.