Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27658297›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Fully-Automated μMRI Morphometric Phenotyping of the Tc1 Mouse Model of Down Syndrome.

Nick M Powell, Marc Modat, M Jorge Cardoso, Da Ma, Holly E Holmes, Yichao Yu, James O'Callaghan, Jon O Cleary, Ben Sinclair, Frances K Wiseman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Human mutations inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Study the LongitudinalFrontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Comparison ofFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nick M PowellTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, 3rd Floor, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-0642
Marc ModatTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, 3rd Floor, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom.
M Jorge CardosoTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, 3rd Floor, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom.
Da MaTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, 3rd Floor, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom.
Holly E HolmesCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.
Yichao YuCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.
James O'CallaghanCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.
Jon O ClearyCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.
Ben SinclairCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.
Frances K WisemanDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Institute of Neurology, University College, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Victor L J TybulewiczThe Francis Crick Institute, Mill Hill Laboratory, London NW7 1AA, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth M C FisherDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, Institute of Neurology, University College, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Mark F LythgoeCentre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.
Sébastien OurselinTranslational Imaging Group, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, 3rd Floor, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Alzheimer's Society 192Medical Research Council G0601056Medical Research Council MR/J01107X/1Medical Research Council MR/J013110/1Medical Research Council MR/K026739/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K500276/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a fully automated pipeline for the morphometric phenotyping of mouse brains from μMRI data, and show its application to the Tc1 mouse model of Down syndrome, to identify new morphological phenotypes in the brain of this first transchromosomic animal carrying human chromosome 21. We incorporate an accessible approach for simultaneously scanning multiple ex vivo brains, requiring only a 3D-printed brain holder, and novel image processing steps for their separation and orientation. We employ clinically established multi-atlas techniques-superior to single-atlas methods-together with publicly-available atlas databases for automatic skull-stripping and tissue segmentation, providing high-quality, subject-specific tissue maps. We follow these steps with group-wise registration, structural parcellation and both Voxel- and Tensor-Based Morphometry-advantageous for their ability to highlight morphological differences without the laborious delineation of regions of interest. We show the application of freely available open-source software developed for clinical MRI analysis to mouse brain data: NiftySeg for segmentation and NiftyReg for registration, and discuss atlases and parameters suitable for the preclinical paradigm. We used this pipeline to compare 29 Tc1 brains with 26 wild-type littermate controls, imaged ex vivo at 9.4T. We show an unexpected increase in Tc1 total intracranial volume and, controlling for this, local volume and grey matter density reductions in the Tc1 brain compared to the wild-types, most prominently in the cerebellum, in agreement with human DS and previous histological findings.

Identifiers

PMID27658297
PMCPMC5033246
OpenAlexW2522187793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.