ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2016
The Effect of Anesthesia on Blood Pressure Measured Noninvasively by Using the Tail-Cuff Method in Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Topics in Marmoset Anesthesia and Analgesia.ILAR journal · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the validity of measuring blood pressure (BP) noninvasively in marmosets by using the tail-cuff method. The number of measurements needed for a valid reading was calculated by plotting the average SD of 5 consecutive readings in 10 naïve marmosets; the SD for both systolic and diastolic BP readings plateaued after 4 readings. To evaluate how anesthesia (alphaxalone, 15 mg/kg IM) affected BP in marmosets, we measured 4 animals every minute for 60 min after injection. The average length of anesthesia was 47.3 ± 13.2 min. The variability in the systolic and diastolic BP was the smallest at 10 to 30 min after injection (systolic SD, 6.29 mm Hg; diastolic SD, 5.27 mm Hg) and almost doubled at 30 to 60 min after injection (systolic SD, 13.5 mm Hg; diastolic SD, 12.3 mm Hg). The within- and between-session repeatability and reproducibility were calculated by measuring 12 marmosets twice at the same time of day (±1 h) 1 wk apart. The coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were 1.98% and 14.5% for systolic BP and 3.37% and 16.2% for diastolic BP, respectively. Our results indicate that using the volumetric tail-cuff method to measure BP noninvasively in anesthetized marmosets is safe and feasible. The measures are least variable within 10 to 30 min after the injection of anesthetic, and variability increases slightly between sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27657716PMC5029832W2530586359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.