Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27657712›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2016

Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Mus musculus).

Rainy D Regan, Judy E Fenyk-Melody, Sam M Tran, Guang Chen, Kim L Stocking

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Circulating CD3Cancer medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Dihydrothiazolo ring-fused 2-pyridone antimicrobial compounds treatbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Evaluation of Submental Blood Collection in Mice (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Comparison of Blood Collection Techniques in Mice and their Effects on Welfare.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. PCR and RT-PCR in the Diagnosis of Laboratory Animal Infections and in Health Monitoring.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of Serial Blood Collection by Facial Vein and Retrobulbar Methods in C57BL/6 Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of Submental Blood Collection with the Retroorbital and Submandibular Methods in Mice (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rainy D ReganComparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA. rainy.regan@gmail.com.
Judy E Fenyk-MelodyComparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sam M TranPathology, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Guang ChenBiostatistics, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kim L StockingComparative Animal Research, Amgen Incorporated, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Amgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonterminal blood sample collection of sufficient volume and quality for research is complicated in mice due to their small size and anatomy. Large (>100 μL) nonterminal volumes of unhemolyzed or unclotted blood currently are typically collected from the retroorbital sinus or submandibular plexus. We developed a third method-submental blood collection-which is similar in execution to the submandibular method but with minor changes in animal restraint and collection location. Compared with other techniques, submental collection is easier to perform due to the direct visibility of the target vessels, which are located in a sparsely furred region. Compared with the submandibular method, the submental method did not differ regarding weight change and clotting score but significantly decreased hemolysis and increased the overall number of high-quality samples. The submental method was performed with smaller lancets for the majority of the bleeds, yet resulted in fewer repeat collection attempts, fewer insufficient samples, and less extraneous blood loss and was qualitatively less traumatic. Compared with the retroorbital technique, the submental method was similar regarding weight change but decreased hemolysis, clotting, and the number of overall high-quality samples; however the retroorbital method resulted in significantly fewer incidents of insufficient sample collection. Extraneous blood loss was roughly equivalent between the submental and retroorbital methods. We conclude that the submental method is an acceptable venipuncture technique for obtaining large, nonterminal volumes of blood from mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Specimen CollectionMicePhlebotomy

Identifiers

PMID27657712
PMCPMC5029828
OpenAlexW2553986801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.