Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27657502›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Validity and Reliability of Ventilatory and Blood Lactate Thresholds in Well-Trained Cyclists.

Jesús G Pallarés, Ricardo Morán-Navarro, Juan Fernando Ortega, Valentín Emilio Fernández-Elías, Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Use ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesús G PallarésUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha, Exercise Physiology Laboratory at Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Ricardo Morán-NavarroUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha, Exercise Physiology Laboratory at Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Juan Fernando OrtegaUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha, Exercise Physiology Laboratory at Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Valentín Emilio Fernández-ElíasUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha, Exercise Physiology Laboratory at Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Ricardo Mora-RodriguezUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha, Exercise Physiology Laboratory at Toledo, Toledo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine, i) the reliability of blood lactate and ventilatory-based thresholds, ii) the lactate threshold that corresponds with each ventilatory threshold (VT1 and VT2) and with maximal lactate steady state test (MLSS) as a proxy of cycling performance.

methodsFourteen aerobically-trained male cyclists ([Formula: see text] 62.1±4.6 ml·kg-1·min-1) performed two graded exercise tests (50 W warm-up followed by 25 W·min-1) to exhaustion. Blood lactate, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] data were collected at every stage. Workloads at VT1 (rise in [Formula: see text];) and VT2 (rise in [Formula: see text]) were compared with workloads at lactate thresholds. Several continuous tests were needed to detect the MLSS workload. Agreement and differences among tests were assessed with ANOVA, ICC and Bland-Altman. Reliability of each test was evaluated using ICC, CV and Bland-Altman plots.

resultsWorkloads at lactate threshold (LT) and LT+2.0 mMol·L-1 matched the ones for VT1 and VT2, respectively (p = 0.147 and 0.539; r = 0.72 and 0.80; Bias = -13.6 and 2.8, respectively). Furthermore, workload at LT+0.5 mMol·L-1 coincided with MLSS workload (p = 0.449; r = 0.78; Bias = -4.5). Lactate threshold tests had high reliability (CV = 3.4-3.7%; r = 0.85-0.89; Bias = -2.1-3.0) except for DMAX method (CV = 10.3%; r = 0.57; Bias = 15.4). Ventilatory thresholds show high reliability (CV = 1.6%-3.5%; r = 0.90-0.96; Bias = -1.8-2.9) except for RER = 1 and V-Slope (CV = 5.0-6.4%; r = 0.79; Bias = -5.6-12.4).

conclusionsLactate threshold tests can be a valid and reliable alternative to ventilatory thresholds to identify the workloads at the transition from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism.

Identifiers

PMID27657502
PMCPMC5033582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.