Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27657495›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2016

Hepatitis C Treatment and Barriers to Eradication.

Monica A Konerman, Anna S F Lok

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03791814 (A Prospective Cohort Study to Improve HCV Care Using Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Dialysis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03791814 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Cohort Study to Improve HCV Care Using Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Dialysis Patients: The MATCH-D Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein Healthcare NetworkRan2019 to 2019Enrolled0ConditionsHepatitis CArmsZepatier
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Guide to the Economics of Hepatitis C Virus Cure in 2017.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Monica A KonermanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Anna S F LokDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is highly efficacious, well-tolerated, and of short duration for the majority of patients. Despite the dramatic advances in therapy, there remain several barriers to disease eradication. These include deficiencies in screening, diagnosis, and access to care, and high cost of the direct-acting antiviral medications. In addition, incident cases and reinfection associated with injection drug use contribute to the persistent worldwide disease burden. This article will review the current CHC treatments, and outline the remaining gaps in therapy and barriers to disease eradication.

Identifiers

PMID27657495
PMCPMC5288596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.