Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27656958›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2017

Mining bifidobacteria from the neonatal gastrointestinal tract for conjugated linolenic acid production.

Bo Yang, Haiqin Chen, Catherine Stanton, Yong Q Chen, Hao Zhang, Wei Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent Development of ProbioticFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of immunology research · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bo Yanga State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology , Jiangnan University , Wuxi , Jiangsu , P. R China.
Haiqin Chena State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology , Jiangnan University , Wuxi , Jiangsu , P. R China.
Catherine Stantonb International Joint Research Laboratory for Probiotics at Jiangnan University , Wuxi , Jiangsu , P. R China.
Yong Q Chena State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology , Jiangnan University , Wuxi , Jiangsu , P. R China.
Hao Zhanga State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology , Jiangnan University , Wuxi , Jiangsu , P. R China.
Wei Chena State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology , Jiangnan University , Wuxi , Jiangsu , P. R China.
Jiangnan University · CNBeijing Technology and Business University · CNState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology · CNTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conjugated linolenic acid (CLNA) is a family of isomers of linolenic acid with a number of health-associated benefits, which has been attracting great interest. Microbial CLNA producers are potentially an alternative source of CLNA for human nutrition. In present study, 16 neonate feces were collected and used for Bifidobacteria isolation, from which 25 bifidobacteria isolates were obtained. The bifidobacteria isolates were identified using 16s rDNA sequencing as Bifidobacterium adolescentis, B. breve, B. longum and B. pseudocatenulatum. These isolates were further investigated for their ability to produce CLNA using linolenic acid as substrate via GC-MS. The results showed most of the isolates could convert free linolenic acid into c9,t11,c15-CLNA and t9,t11,c15-CLNA at different levels. B. pseudocatenulatum was the most effective CLNA producer, which converted 86.91% of linolenic acid to c9,t11,c15-CLNA and 3.59% of to t9,t11,c15-CLNA isomer and the isolate exhibited to accumulate CLNA during 72 h culturing in which most CLNA isomers were in the supernatant fluid. The results indicated that utilization of this isolate for CLNA production will eliminate the purification process.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansInfant, NewbornLinoleic Acids, ConjugatedMaleSpecies SpecificitySpecimen HandlingLinoleic Acids, Conjugatedbifidobacteriabioconversionconjugated linolenic acidisolation

Identifiers

PMID27656958
PMCPMC5470518
OpenAlexW2521729945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.