Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27656633›Full record

ArticleJournal of exercise rehabilitation2016

Influence of the actions observed on cervical motion in patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study.

Lucía de-la-Puente-Ranea, Beatriz García-Calvo, Roy La Touche, Josué Fernández-Carnero, Alfonso Gil-Martínez

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04265248 (Effectiveness of Cervical Exercises Using Virtual Reality Headsets on Pain and Disability in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04265248 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Cervical Exercises Using Virtual Reality Headsets on Pain and Disability in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorJosue Fernandez CarneroRan2020 to 2020Enrolled45ConditionsChronic Pain, Pain, NeckArmsVirtual Reality Headset, Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucía de-la-Puente-RaneaCentro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz García-CalvoRuber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Roy La ToucheCentro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; Research Group on Movement and Behavioral Science and Study of Pain, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), Madrid, Spain.
Josué Fernández-CarneroCentro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; Research Group on Movement and Behavioral Science and Study of Pain, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physical Therapy, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso Gil-MartínezCentro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; Research Group on Movement and Behavioral Science and Study of Pain, The Center for Advanced Studies University La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present pilot study was to prove if the action-observation (AOb) improved the cervical range of motion (CROM) in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain (CNP). Double blind pilot study. A total of 28 subjects were randomly assigned to an effective-movement group (n=14) and an ineffective-movement group (n=14). The follow-up consisted of: pretreatment, posttreatment and 10 min after second measurement (motor imagery). Outcome measures were CROM, and pres-sure pain detection thresholds (PPDTs). No statistical differences were found in baseline on CROM and on the PPDT. Test for independent groups revealed significant changes in cervical rotation movement. Both groups in posttreatment (P=0.042; Cohen d=0.81) and after 10 min (P=0.019; Cohen d=0.9). For intragroup PPDT, the Wilcoxon test revealed significant effects in the effective movement at C2 of the pre to 10-min post (P=0.040). However, the ineffective movement revealed a significant reduction in PPDT in zygapophyseal joint of C5-C6 as the pre to post (P=0.010) as the pre to 10-min post (P=0.041) periods. In conclusions this pilot study demonstrated that the effective AOb produced significant changes versus ineffective AOb in the CROM and it could influences in PPT in subject with CNP immediately.

Indexed as

Chronic neck painMirror neuronObserved action

Identifiers

PMID27656633
PMCPMC5031389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.