Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27656558›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Evaluation of Histomorphometric Changes in Tissue Architecture in Relation to Alteration in Fixation Protocol - An Invitro Study.

Pallav Singhal, Narendra Nath Singh, Gadiputi Sreedhar, Sumita Banerjee, Manu Batra, Anu Garg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pallav SinghalSenior Lecturer, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sarjug Dental College , Darbhanga, Bihar, India .
Narendra Nath SinghProfessor and Head, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Kothiwal Dental College , Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India .
Gadiputi SreedharProfessor and Head, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences , Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India .
Sumita BanerjeeSenior Lecturer, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, The Dental College, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences , Imphal, Manipur, India .
Manu BatraSenior Lecturer, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Surendera Dental College , Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India .
Anu GargPostgraduate Student, Department of Pedodontics, Himachal Institute of Dental Science , Paonta Sahib, Himachal Pradesh, India .
Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreparation of good tissue specimens for microscopy requires complete fixation. No ideal fixative has been found till date, with every fixative showing advantages and disadvantages. Appropriate fixation is required to maintain clear and consistent morphologic features for histologic examination. Pathologists mostly examine formalin fixed tissue sections and are less used to the morphologic changes induced by other fixatives. Underfixed and overfixed tissue in various fixatives can lead to tissue architectural changes which can affect its diagnostic value.

aimTo assess sectioning ability, staining intensity and microscopic details of tissues kept in different fixatives at different time intervals. MATERIALS AND

methodsFresh tissue specimen i.e., goat tongue was collected and its middle-third portion was used for the study purpose. The tissue was grossed into 10 equal pieces and kept in various fixatives (10% Buffered formalin, Carnoy's solution, Absolute ethyl alcohol, Bouin's fluid) for five different time intervals (6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 hours) and normal tissue processing steps were carried out followed by sectioning and staining. During sectioning, sectioning parameter was assessed. Following sectioning, sections were observed under light microscope and were histologically evaluated for staining and microscopic details. To calculate the sectioning parameter Fisher's exact test was used and to assess parameters for staining and microscopic details Mann-Whitney U test was used.

resultsAccording to the study, 10% buffered formaldehyde is considered as a superior fixative under all parameters followed by Bouin's fluid, Carnoy's solution and Absolute alcohol.

conclusionIn our study, it was concluded that 10% buffered formaldehyde should be continued as a routine fixative however, other fixatives can be used depending upon the non-availability of required fixative or in case of emergencies. Pathologist should be accustomed to histologic and morphologic changes of underfixed and overfixed tissue which can affect its diagnostic value.

Indexed as

Absolute ethyl alcoholBouin’s fluidBuffered formalinCarnoy’s solutionIncomplete fixationOver-fixationUnder-fixation

Identifiers

PMID27656558
PMCPMC5028485
OpenAlexW2519793790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.