Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27656461›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016

Is This a Drug?" Answers From Medical Students in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India.

Ananya Mandal, Tania Sur Kundu, Parama Sengupta, Arijit Ghosh, Nina Das

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ananya MandalAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College , Kolkata, West Bengal, India .
Tania Sur KunduAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College , Kolkata, West Bengal, India .
Parama SenguptaAssistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College , Kolkata, West Bengal, India .
Arijit GhoshAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Malda Medical College , Kolkata, West Bengal, India .
Nina DasProfessor, Department of Pharmacology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College , Kolkata, West Bengal, India .
Bankura Sammilani Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorld Health Organization (WHO) defines what is drug and what is not. Second year MBBS students learn the principles of Pharmacology that they use in their later clinical practice life. The aim of the survey was to determine how medical students classify a range of preparations they might encounter in their professional lives and whether a brand name or a commercial preparation of a drug would influence their decision in the categorization of the preparation as a 'drug' or 'not a drug'.

aimTo assess the knowledge of medical students, if a substance or product is a drug. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe surveyed 2 concurrent years of medical students to classify 60 candidate medicinal preparations into "drug" and "not-drug" from a validated questionnaire. The candidate preparations were named either in generic or in their commercially available forms and they were all essential drugs as per WHO definition.

resultsThe two groups of students, A and B, included 192 and 215 students respectively. Demographically there was little difference in the two groups. Agents like Aspirin, Paracetamol, Amphetamine, Salbutamol, Atropine, Dextromethorphan, Codeine, Diazepam, Ciprofloxacin ear drops, Levonorgestrol, Neosporin eye ointment, Furosemide, Metronidazole, Penicillin, Sorbitrate, Lignocaine, Methotrexate, Penicillin, Zolpidem and Thalidomide received almost unanimous votes as drugs. Arsenic trioxide, Fentanyl and petroleum jelly were considered to be "non-drugs" by most participants. The two groups did not differ significantly in their responses.

conclusionSome major lacunae were noted in the knowledge of the participating students despite book teaching on the definition of a drug. Drugs used for prophylaxis and those used in physiological conditions or topically, were often missed. These gaps need to be filled by more emphasis on definition of a drug and its clinical applicability based on example and case based studies.

Indexed as

Medical educationMedicinePharmacology

Identifiers

PMID27656461
PMCPMC5028524
OpenAlexW2514029917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.