Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27656350›Full record

ArticleFire science reviews

Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence.

Max T Kinateder, Erica D Kuligowski, Paul A Reneke, Richard D Peacock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fire science reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Public Risk Perception in China on the Intention to Use Sports APPs during COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of Risk Perception on Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. A Modelling Framework for Householder Decision-Making for Wildfire Emergencies.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Max T KinatederDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown Unversity, Providence, RI USA.
Erica D KuligowskiNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.
Paul A RenekeNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.
Richard D PeacockNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk perception (RP) is studied in many research disciplines (e.g., safety engineering, psychology, and sociology). Definitions of RP can be broadly divided into expectancy-value and risk-as-feeling approaches. In the present review, RP is seen as the personalization of the risk related to a current event, such as an ongoing fire emergency; it is influenced by emotions and prone to cognitive biases. We differentiate RP from other related concepts (e.g., situation awareness) and introduce theoretical frameworks relevant to RP in fire evacuation (e.g., Protective Action Decision Model and Heuristic-Systematic approaches). Furthermore, we review studies on RP during evacuation with a focus on the World Trade Center evacuation on September 11, 2001 and present factors modulating RP as well as the relation between perceived risk and protective actions. We summarize the factors that influence perception risk and discuss the direction of these relationships (i.e., positive or negative influence, or inconsequential) and conclude with presenting limitations of this review and an outlook on future research.

Indexed as

EgressEvacuationEvacuation modelingFire safetyHuman factorsRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID27656350
PMCPMC5012356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.