Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27656326›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2016

Spinal cord fusion with PEG-GNRs (TexasPEG): Neurophysiological recovery in 24 hours in rats.

C-Yoon Kim, William K A Sikkema, In-Kyu Hwang, Hanseul Oh, Un Jeng Kim, Bae Hwan Lee, James M Tour

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Translational Regenerative Therapies for Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Houston, GEMINI has landed: Spinal cord fusion achieved.Surgical neurology international · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C-Yoon KimDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea; Department of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
William K A SikkemaDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
In-Kyu HwangDepartment of Stem Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Hanseul OhDepartment of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Un Jeng KimDepartment of Physiology, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Bae Hwan LeeDepartment of Physiology, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
James M TourDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA; The NanoCarbon Center, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Material Science and Nanoengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yonsei University · KRSeoul National University · KRKonkuk University · KRRice University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe GEMINI spinal cord fusion protocol has been developed to achieve a successful cephalosomatic anastomosis. Here, for the first time, we report the effects of locally applied water-soluble, conductive PEG(polyethylene glycol)ylated graphene nanoribbons (PEG-GNRs) on neurophysiologic conduction after sharp cervical cord transection in rats. PEG-GNRs were produced by the polymerization of ethylene oxide from anion-edged graphene nanoribbons. These combine the fusogenic potential of PEG with the electrical conducting properties of the graphene nanoribbons.

methodsLaminectomy and transection of cervical spinal cord (C5) was performed on Female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. After applying PEG-GNR on the severed part, electrophysiological recovery of the reconstructed cervical spinal cord was confirmed by somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) at 24 h after surgery.

resultsWhile no SSEPs were detected in the control group, PEG-GNR treated group showed fast recovery of SSEPs at 24 h after the surgery.

conclusionIn this preliminary dataset, for the first time, we report the effect of a novel form of PEG with the goal of rapid reconstruction of a sharply severed spinal cord.

Indexed as

Cephalosomatic anastomosiselectrophysiologyGEMINIgraphene nanoribbonsspinal cord fusion

Identifiers

PMID27656326
PMCPMC5025948
OpenAlexW2519059721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.