Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27656070›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Effect of chitosan-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid on Enterococcus faecalis dentinal biofilm and smear layer removal.

Nagarajan Geethapriya, Arunajatesan Subbiya, Kesavaram Padmavathy, Krishnan Mahalakshmi, Paramasivam Vivekanandan, Virudhachalam Ganapathy Sukumaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nanoparticles in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nagarajan GeethapriyaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Bharath University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arunajatesan SubbiyaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Bharath University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kesavaram PadmavathyDepartment of Microbiology, Research Laboratory for Oral and Systemic Health, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Bharath University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Krishnan MahalakshmiDepartment of Microbiology, Research Laboratory for Oral and Systemic Health, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Bharath University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Paramasivam VivekanandanDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Bharath University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Virudhachalam Ganapathy SukumaranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, BIHER, Bharath University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital · INBharath University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of chitosan and chitosan-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (3:1,1:1,1:3) in comparison with 5.2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in disinfecting Enterococcus faecalis biofilm on root canal dentin and in the removal of smear layer with minimal erosion. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy single-rooted extracted human mandibular premolars (n = 70) were selected for the study. Forty tooth samples were biomechanically prepared, vertically sectioned, and sterilized by autoclaving. The tooth sections were artificially infected with E. faecalis (ATCC 29212 [n = 35] and clinical isolate [SBEF2, n = 35]) to form mature dentinal biofilm in vitro. The tooth samples were treated with the test solutions: chitosan and chitosan-EDTA (3:1, 1:1, 1:3), and the killing time was determined. The smear layer removal ability of the test solutions (Group A: chitosan-EDTA [1:1], Group B: EDTA, Group C: control) (n = 10 tooth/group) was assessed.

resultsChitosan and chitosan-EDTA (3:1, 1:1, 1:3) exhibited antibacterial activity against both the strains of E. faecalis. Chitosan and chitosan-EDTA caused 3 log reduction in the viable count of the sessile cells of E. faecalis at 15 min while 5.2% NaOCl exhibited 99.98% inhibition at 15 min. Chitosan-EDTA (1:1) was found to be effective in removing the smear layer and showed lesser erosion than EDTA at the coronal and middle portions.

conclusionChitosan-EDTA (1:1) is a potential root canal irrigant that performs a dual role - root canal disinfection and smear layer removal.

Indexed as

Chitosanchitosan-ethylenediamine tetraacetic aciddentinal biofilmEnterococcus faecalisethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

Identifiers

PMID27656070
PMCPMC5026111
OpenAlexW2510063300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.