Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27655946›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Incorporating Functional Annotations for Fine-Mapping Causal Variants in a Bayesian Framework Using Summary Statistics.

Wenan Chen, Shannon K McDonnell, Stephen N Thibodeau, Lori S Tillmans, Daniel J Schaid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenan ChenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.ORCID 0000-0003-0379-2368
Shannon K McDonnellDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Stephen N ThibodeauDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Lori S TillmansDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.
Daniel J SchaidDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 schaid@mayo.edu.

Funding

Quantitative Methods for Genetic EpidemiologyR01GM065450 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCHAID, DANIEL J. · 2002 to 2020
$5.6M
Functional Significance of Prostate Cancer risk-SNPsR01CA151254 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI THIBODEAU, STEPHEN NORMAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151254NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional annotations have been shown to improve both the discovery power and fine-mapping accuracy in genome-wide association studies. However, the optimal strategy to incorporate the large number of existing annotations is still not clear. In this study, we propose a Bayesian framework to incorporate functional annotations in a systematic manner. We compute the maximum a posteriori solution and use cross validation to find the optimal penalty parameters. By extending our previous fine-mapping method CAVIARBF into this framework, we require only summary statistics as input. We also derived an exact calculation of Bayes factors using summary statistics for quantitative traits, which is necessary when a large proportion of trait variance is explained by the variants of interest, such as in fine mapping expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL). We compared the proposed method with PAINTOR using different strategies to combine annotations. Simulation results show that the proposed method achieves the best accuracy in identifying causal variants among the different strategies and methods compared. We also find that for annotations with moderate effects from a large annotation pool, screening annotations individually and then combining the top annotations can produce overly optimistic results. We applied these methods on two real data sets: a meta-analysis result of lipid traits and a cis-eQTL study of normal prostate tissues. For the eQTL data, incorporating annotations significantly increased the number of potential causal variants with high probabilities.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAlgorithmsContig MappingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationSensitivity and SpecificityannotationsBayesian fine mappingcausal variantssummary statistics

Identifiers

PMID27655946
PMCPMC5105870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.